The reviewer strikes back: Oldroyd to Latour
Social Epistemology 2 (2):181 – 182 (1988)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJeff Kochan (2010). Latour's Heidegger. Social Studies of Science 40 (4):579-598.
David Oldroyd (2004). The Substrata of Geologists. Metascience 13 (1):98-101.
Gesa Lindemann (2011). On Latour's Social Theory and Theory of Society, and His Contribution to Saving the World. Human Studies 34 (1):93-110.
David Oldroyd (2011). Leibniz: The Practical Metaphysician. Metascience 20 (2):303-307.
David Oldroyd (2012). Early Geology in Focus. Metascience 21 (3):569-573.
David Oldroyd (2011). The Geological Society's Birthday. Metascience 20 (1):177-184.
David Oldroyd (2011). Humboldtian Science. Metascience 20 (3):581-584.
Bruno Latour (1987). The Author Responds: Latour to Oldroyd. Social Epistemology 1 (4):347 – 350.
Bruno Latour (1988). The Author Rebounds: Latour to Oldroyd. Social Epistemology 2 (2):183.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-02-01Total downloads2 ( #232,211 of 548,970 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,970 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
