Meaning and evidence: A reply to Lewis
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):206 – 211 (1993)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn R. Lucas (1984). Lucas Against Mechanism II: A Rejoinder. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 14 (June):189-91.
Peter A. Graham (2008). A Defense of Local Miracle Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 140 (1):65 - 82.
Denis McManus (2000). Boghossian, Miller and Lewis on Dispositional Theories of Meaning. Mind and Language 15 (4):393-399.
David Papineau & Víctor Durà-Vilà (2009). Reply to Lewis: Metaphysics Versus Epistemology. Analysis 69 (1):89-91.
H. S. Thayer (1979). Meaning, Mind and Lewis: A Reply to Bennett. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 15 (3):234 - 242.
David Lewis (1992). Meaning Without Use: Reply to Hawthorne. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1):106 – 110.
John Greco (2006). How to Be a Pragmatist: C. I. Lewis and Humean Skepticism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 42 (1):24-31.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads16 ( #74,716 of 549,125 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,125 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
