David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (3):247–272 (1999)
Yah boo sucks to the grammer wot we lernt in skool! Grammar (and the bad old traditional logic) says that quantifier phrases such as 'nobody', 'everyone', 'all women', 'some men' and 'a man' are in the same category as names such as 'Milly', 'Molly' and 'Mandy'. So, prior to their first corrective lessons, students are awfully muddled, the first and fundamental problem being the Woozle hunt for somebody called 'nobody'. Hoorah for modern logic and logic teachers! The story used to justify our current logics is entirely fictional. The claims about names and quantifier phrases in English are wildly false. Two of the heroes of modern logic, Russell and Hilbert, make the very mistakes which are falsely blamed on traditional logic. The villain, Meinong, turns out to have been working a different patch. Ideas ascribed to traditional grammar are modern inventions. Neither logicians nor grammarians can be trusted to tell the history of either grammar or logic
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
David Liggins (2008). Quine, Putnam, and the 'Quine-Putnam' Indispensability Argument. Erkenntnis 68 (1):113 - 127.
Tim Crane (2012). Philosophy, Logic, Science, History. Metaphilosophy 43 (1-2):20-37.
Alex Oliver (2005). The Reference Principle. Analysis 65 (287):177–187.
David Liggins (2007). Quine, Putnam, and the ‘Quine–Putnam’ Indispensability Argument. Erkenntnis 68 (1):113-127.
Similar books and articles
George Englebretsen (2002). Syllogistic: Old Wine in New Bottles. History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (1):31-35.
Gila Sher (2011). Is Logic in the Mind or in the World? Synthese 181 (2):353 - 365.
Graeme Forbes (1994). Modern Logic: A Text in Elementary Symbolic Logic. Oxford University Press.
Gabriel Sandu (2009). Logic and Semantics in the Twentieth Century. In Leila Haaparanta (ed.), The Development of Modern Logic. Oxford University Press 562.
Charlie Kurth (2011). Logic for Morals, Morals From Logic. Philosophical Studies 155 (2):161-180.
Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2002). What is Logical Form? In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Clarendon Press 54--90.
Sten Ebbesen (2007). The Traditions of Ancient Logic-Cum-Grammar in the Middle Ages—What's the Problem? Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):136-152.
J. P. Cleave (1991). A Study of Logics. Oxford University Press.
Wilfrid Hodges (2009). Traditional Logic, Modern Logic and Natural Language. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (6):589 - 606.
Peter Long (2001). Logic, Form, and Grammar. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads62 ( #69,148 of 1,906,957 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #345,326 of 1,906,957 )
How can I increase my downloads?