Graduate studies at Western
Analysis 54 (4):215 - 223 (1994)
|Abstract||The fundamental thesis of David Lewis's "Parts of Classes" is that the nonempty subsets of a set are mereological parts of it. This paper shows that Lewis's considerations in favor of this thesis are unpersuasive. First, common speech provides no support. Second, the formal analogy between mereology and the Boolean algebra of sets can be explained without accepting the thesis. Third, it is very doubtful that the thesis is fruitful. Certainly, Lewis's claim that it helps us understand set theory is unwarranted|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
David Lewis (1993). Mathematics in Megethology. Philosophia Mathematica 1 (1):3-23.
Nino B. Cocchiarella (2009). Mass Nouns in a Logic of Classes as Many. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):343 - 361.
Guram Bezhanishvili, Leo Esakia & David Gabelaia (2005). Some Results on Modal Axiomatization and Definability for Topological Spaces. Studia Logica 81 (3):325 - 355.
Neil Tennant (2013). Parts, Classes and Parts of Classes: An Anti-Realist Reading of Lewisian Mereology. Synthese 190 (4):709-742.
David Lewis (1991). Parts of Classes. Blackwell.
Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1980). Tarski and Proper Classes. Analysis 40 (4):6-11.
Jose A. Benardete (1992). Parts of Classes. The Review of Metaphysics 45 (3):620-622.
Jeffrey S. Olson (2006). Subdirectly Irreducible Residuated Semilattices and Positive Universal Classes. Studia Logica 83 (1-3):393 - 406.
Peter Forrest (1991). Book Review: David Lewis. Parts of Classes. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 32 (3):494-497.
John L. Bell (2000). Sets and Classes as Many. Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (6):585-601.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2003). Plural Quantification and Classes. Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):67-81.
David-Hillel Ruben (1999). Actions and Their Parts. In Proceedings of the Twentith World Congress of Philosophy, vol. 2.
Lowell Friesen (2006). Natural Classes of Universals: Why Armstrong's Analysis Fails. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):285 – 296.
Added to index2011-05-29
Total downloads12 ( #101,300 of 738,396 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,396 )
How can I increase my downloads?