Hypatia 15 (3):1-18 (2000)
|Abstract||: Our stereotypes of maternity and paternity as manifest in the history of philosophy and psychoanalysis interfere with the ability to imagine loving relationships. The associations of maternity with antisocial nature and paternity with disembodied cul-ture are inadequate to set up primary love relationships. Analyzing the conflicts in these associations, I reformulate the maternal body as social and lawful, and I re-formulate the paternal function as embodied, which enables imagining our primary relationships as loving|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Simon May (2011). Love: A History. Yale University Press.
John Wilson (1995). Love Between Equals: A Philosophical Study of Love and Sexual Relationships. St. Martin's Press.
Camilla Kronqvist (2011). The Promise That Love Will Last. Inquiry 54 (6):650 - 668.
Robert Brown (1987). Analyzing Love. Cambridge University Press.
Lubomir Lamy (2011). Love or the Black Sun of Personal Relationships. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (3):247-259.
John Giles Milhaven (1980). Response to "Pure Love" by Robert Merrihew Adams. Journal of Religious Ethics 8 (1):101 - 104.
Susan Power Bratton (1993). Loving Nature. Environmental Ethics 15 (1):3-25.
Susan P. Bratton (1992). Loving Nature: Eros or Agape? Environmental Ethics 14 (1):3-25.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #77,993 of 722,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?