Synthese 112 (3):379-402 (1997)
|Abstract||The present article aims at showing that it is possible to construct a realist philosophy of mathematics which commits one neither to dream the dreams of Platonism nor to reduce the word ''realism'' to mere noise.It is argued that mathematics is a science of patterns, where patterns are not objects (or properties of objects), but aspects, or aspects of aspects, etc. of objects. (The notion of aspect originates from ideas sketched by Wittgenstein in the Philosophical Investigations.).|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. Steiner (2000). Mathematics as a Science of Patterns. Philosophical Review 109 (1):115-118.
Felix Mühlhölzer (2006). "A Mathematical Proof Must Be Surveyable" What Wittgenstein Meant by This and What It Implies. Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):57-86.
Alan Baker (2003). The Indispensability Argument and Multiple Foundations for Mathematics. Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):49–67.
Oystein Linnebo, Review of Stewart Shapiro, Philosophy of Mathematics: Structure and Ontology. [REVIEW]
James Franklin (2011). Aristotelianism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (1):3-15.
John Bigelow & Robert Pargetter (1990). Science and Necessity. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas Tymoczko (1991). Mathematics, Science and Ontology. Synthese 88 (2):201 - 228.
James Franklin (2009). Aristotelian Realism. In A. Irvine (ed.), The Philosophy of Mathematics (Handbook of the Philosophy of Science series). North-Holland Elsevier.
Michael D. Resnik (1997). Mathematics as a Science of Patterns. New York ;Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #83,035 of 549,017 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,261 of 549,017 )
How can I increase my downloads?