David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):70-84 (2007)
Joan Copjec has shown that modernity is privy to a notion of immortality all its own – one that differs fundamentally from any counterpart entertained in Greek antiquity or the Christian Middle Ages. She points to Blumenberg and Lefort as thinkers who have construed this concept in its modern guise in different ways, and ultimately opts for Lefort's paradoxical understanding of immortality as the ‘transcending of time, within time' before elaborating on a corresponding notion in Lacan's work. It can be shown that Nietzsche, too, provides a distinctly modern conception of ‘immortality', articulated in relation to his notions of affirmation, singularity and eternal recurrence. In brief, this amounts to his claim that, to affirm even one single part or event in one's life entails affirming it in its entirety, and, in so doing – given the interconnectedness of events – affirming all that has ever existed. Moreover, once anything has existed, it is in a certain sense, for Nietzsche, necessary despite its temporal singularity. Therefore, to be able to rise to the task of affirming certain actions or experiences in one's own life, bestows on it not merely this kind of necessary singularity, but what he thought of as ‘eternal recurrence' – the (ethical) affirmation of the desire to embrace one's own, and together with it, all of existence ‘eternally', over and over. This, it is argued, may be understood as Nietzsche's distinctive contribution to a specifically modern notion of immortality: the ability of an individual to live in such a way that his or her singular ‘place' in society is ensured, necessarily there, even after his or her death. South African Journal of Philosophy Vol. 26 (1) 2007: pp. 70-84
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lawrence J. Hatab (2005). Nietzsche's Life Sentence: Coming to Terms with Eternal Recurrence. Routledge.
Philip J. Kain (2007). Eternal Recurrence and the Categorical Imperative. Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (1):105-116.
Philip J. Kain (2009). Nietzsche and the Horror of Existence. Lexington Books.
Lester H. Hunt (1993). The Eternal Recurrence and Nietzsche's Ethic of Virtue. International Studies in Philosophy 25 (2):3-11.
A. W. Moore (2006). Williams, Nietzsche, and the Meaninglessness of Immortality. Mind 115 (458):311-330.
David Rowe (2012). The Eternal Return of the Same: Nietzsche's "Valueless" Revaluation of All Values. Parrhesia (15):71-86.
Alphonso Lingis (1978). Differance in the Eternal Recurrence of the Same. Research in Phenomenology 8 (1):77-91.
Milic Capek (1960). The Theory of Eternal Recurrence in Modern Philosophy of Science, with Special Reference to C. S. Peirce. Journal of Philosophy 57 (9):289-296.
Tom Stern (2008). Nietzsche on Context and the Individual. Nietzscheforschung 15:299-315.
Tom Stern (2011). Back to the Future: Eternal Recurrence and the Death of Socrates. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 41 (1):73-82.
Philip J. Kain (2004). Nietzsche, the Kantian Self, and Eternal Recurrence. Idealistic Studies 34 (3):225-238.
Kathleen O'Dwyer (forthcoming). Nietzsche's Challenge: Eternal Recurrence. Journal of Humanistic Psychology.
Christopher Hamilton (2000). Nietzsche on Nobility and the Affirmation of Life. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (2):169-193.
Philip J. Kain (2007). Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, and the Horror of Existence. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 33 (1):49-63.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads14 ( #95,238 of 1,088,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #30,953 of 1,088,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?