David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Research in Phenomenology 16 (1):171-184 (1986)
Heidegger has shown how the subject-predicate structure of language and the substance-accident structure of things are both derived from the analysis of the "mere thing" into some matter that stands together with some form, a form always determined by the use to which the thing will be put. Regardless of what we try to say, discourse concerns itself with some subject related to some predicate in a manner indicating either that it is useful or that it is stripped bare of usefulness. ;Therefore, within the law of contradiction, that is, insofar as "S is P," our thought is always already structured by this obscure origin. The system of discourse always signifies and represents, the appearance of the thing becomes constant, language becomes constant: form and matter, subject and predicate. ;All attempts to directly oppose the discursive system result in cooption. Yet, Kant and Hegel make way for the spatial and temporal, thus discursive counter to the significational system. They do this not by directly confronting it in order to produce yet another level of signification, but by opening up a space for thought. Kant discovers the acategorical "sublime," and Hegel dissolves the substantiality of the object, opening up the possibility of other logics and grammars. ;There emerged a surplus never completely enframed by discourse. Painting deliberately evaded the realm of non-contradiction, politely declined the positing of significations, the logic and grammar of an object with or without use. It has brought us to a confrontation with "stupidity," where there is nothing to know , and there is no history . There is only a great despair. ;Yet, this despair is thought facing its own dogmatism, recognizing that there is "something happening" rather than nothing, and seeking its orientation from this "it is happening," rather than from discourse dominated by a single logic, a single grammar, a single truth
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dorothea Olkowski (1993). Heidegger, Art and Politics. International Studies in Philosophy 25 (1):89-90.
Norman Kreitman (2011). Intrinsic Aesthetic Value Revisted. Metaphilosophy 42 (4):470-478.
Duane Halbur (2011). Developing Your Theoretical Orientation in Counseling and Psychotherapy. Pearson.
Ben-Ami Scharfstein (2009). Art Without Borders: A Philosophical Exploration of Art and Humanity. University of Chicago Press.
Joachim W. Marz, Thomas L. Powers & Thomas Queisser (2003). Corporate and Individual Influences on Managers' Social Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (1):1 - 11.
W. Weidle & E. P. Halperin (1957). Biology of Art: Initial Formulation and Primary Orientation. Diogenes 5 (17):1-15.
Lindy Wingfield & Helen Haste (1987). Connectedness and Separateness: Cognitive Style or Moral Orientation? Journal of Moral Education 16 (3):214-225.
J. Michael Rayburn & L. Gayle Rayburn (1996). Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Type a Personality and Ethical-Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11):1209 - 1219.
Norman Kreitman (2011). Art as Orientation. Metaphilosophy 42 (5):642-657.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #444,625 of 1,934,441 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,381 of 1,934,441 )
How can I increase my downloads?