Hypatia 15 (3):73-91 (2000)
|Abstract||: Luce Irigaray is often cited as the principle feminist who adheres to phenomenology as a method of descriptive philosophy. A different approach to Irigaray might well open the way to not only an avoidance of phenomenology's sexist tendencies, but the recognition that the breach between Irigaray's ideas and those of phenomenology is complete. I argue that this occurs and that Irigaray's work directly implicates a Bergsonian critique of the limits of phenomenology|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Joyce Nira Davidson & Mick Smith (1999). Wittgenstein and Irigaray: Gender and Philosophy in a Language (Game) of Difference. Hypatia 14 (2):72 - 96.
Anne van Leeuwen (2010). Sexuate Difference, Ontological Difference: Between Irigaray and Heidegger. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (1):111-126.
Joyce N. Davidson & Mick Smith (1999). Wittgenstein and Irigaray: Gender and Philosophy in a Language (Game) of Difference. Hypatia 14 (2):72-96.
Elizabeth Hirsh, Gary A. Olson & Gaëton Brulotte (1995). "Je-Luce Irigaray": A Meeting with Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 10 (2):93 - 114.
Anne Leeuwen (2013). An Examination of Irigaray's Commitment to Transcendental Phenomenology in The Forgetting of Air and The Way of Love. Hypatia 28 (3):452-468.
Kate Ince (1996). Questions to Luce Irigaray. Hypatia 11 (2):122 - 140.
Rebecca Hill (2011). The Interval: Relation and Becoming in Irigaray, Aristotle, and Bergson. Fordham University Press.
Rebecca Hill (2008). Interval, Sexual Difference: Luce Irigaray and Henri Bergson. Hypatia 23 (1):119-131.
Lynda Haas (1993). Review: Of Waters and Women: The Philosophy of Luce Irigaray. [REVIEW] Hypatia 8 (4):150 - 159.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,609 of 722,700 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,006 of 722,700 )
How can I increase my downloads?