Measuring coherence using LP-models
Journal of Applied Logic 2 (4):451-455 (2004)
| Abstract | This paper introduces a technique for measuring the degree of (in)coherence of inconsistent sets of propositional formulas. The coherence of these sets of formulas is calculated using the minimal models of those sets in G. Priest's Logic of Paradox. The compatibility of the information expressed by a set of formulas with the background or domain knowledge can also be measured with this technique. In this way, Hunter's objections to many-valued paraconsistent logics as instruments for measuring (in)coherence are addressed. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Paraconsistent logics Many-valued logics (In)consistency measures | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIgor Douven & Wouter Meijs (2007). Measuring Coherence. Synthese 156 (3):405 - 425.
A. Avron & B. Konikowska (2008). Rough Sets and 3-Valued Logics. Studia Logica 90 (1):69 - 92.
Richard DeWitt (2005). On Retaining Classical Truths and Classical Deducibility in Many-Valued and Fuzzy Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (5-6):545 - 560.
Marcelo E. Coniglio & Newton M. Peron (2009). A Paraconsistentist Approach to Chisholm's Paradox. Principia 13 (3):299-326.
O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky (2011). Ideal Paraconsistent Logics. Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2010-04-11Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
