David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Educational Philosophy and Theory 40 (1):96–117 (2008)
This article explores the affinities and parallels between Foucault's Nietzschean view of history and models of complexity developed in the physical sciences in the twentieth century. It claims that Foucault's rejection of structuralism and Marxism can be explained as a consequence of his own approach which posits a radical ontology whereby the conception of the totality or whole is reconfigured as an always open, relatively borderless system of infinite interconnections, possibilities and developments. His rejection of Hegelianism, as well as of other enlightenment philosophies, can be understood at one level as a direct response to his rejection of the mechanical atomist, and organicist epistemological world views, based upon a Newtonian conception of a closed universe operating upon the basis of a small number of invariable and universal laws, by which all could be predicted and explained. The idea of a fully determined, closed universe is replaced; and in a way parallel to complexity theories, Foucault's own approach emphasises notions such as self‐organisation and dissipative structures; time as an irreversible, existential dimension; a world of finite resources but with infinite possibilities for articulation, or re‐investment; and characterised by the principles of openness, indeterminism, unpredictability, and uncertainty. The implications of Foucault's type of approach are then explored in relation to identity, creativity, and the uniqueness of the person. The article suggests that within a complexity theory approach many of the old conundrums concerning determinism and creativity, social constructionism and uniqueness, can be overcome
|Keywords||creativity uncertainty science Heidegger complexity theory Ilya Prigogine Marxism predictability Structuralism uniqueness Nietzsche identity|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
George Lazaroiu (2013). Besley on Foucault's Discourse of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (8):821-832.
Similar books and articles
Francois Ewald (1999). Foucault and the Contemporary Scene. Philosophy and Social Criticism 25 (3):81-91.
L. Wolfgang Bibel (2004). AI and the Conquest of Complexity in Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (3):159-180.
Jacqueline Mariña & Franklin Mason (2001). Aristotle as A-Theorist: Overcoming the Myth of Passage. Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):169-192.
Jacqueline Mariña & Franklin Mason (2001). Aristotle as a-Theorist: Overcoming the Myth of Passage. Journal of the History of Philosophy 39 (2):169-192.
Roger Mourad (2003). After Foucault: A New Form of Right. Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (4):451-481.
Geoff Danaher (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sage Publications.
Ian Burkitt (1993). Overcoming Metaphysics: Elias and Foucault on Power and Freedom. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):50-72.
Mark Olssen (2010). Discourse, Complexity, Life : Elaborating the Possibilities of Foucault's Materialist Concept of Discourse. In Colin B. Grant (ed.), Beyond Universal Pragmatics: Studies in the Philosophy of Communication. Peter Lang.
Paul Taborsky (2010). The Logic of Cultures. Peter Lang.
Juan Pascual-Leone (1998). To Appraise Developmental Difficulty or Mental Demand, Relational Complexity is Not Enough. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):843-844.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #146,729 of 1,679,329 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #182,781 of 1,679,329 )
How can I increase my downloads?