David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (2004)
Are inequalities of income created by the free market just? In this book Serena Olsaretti examines two main arguments that justify those inequalities: the first claims that they are just because they are deserved, and the second claims that they are just because they are what free individuals are entitled to. Both these arguments purport to show, in different ways, that giving responsible individuals their due requires that free market inequalities in incomes be allowed. Olsaretti argues, however, that neither argument is successful, and shows that when we examine closely the principle of desert and the notions of liberty and choice invoked by defenders of the free market, it appears that a conception of justice that would accommodate these notions, far from supporting free market inequalities, calls for their elimination. Her book will be of interest to a wide range of readers in political philosophy, political theory, and normative economics
|Keywords||Distributive justice Free enterprise Social aspects Free enterprise Moral and ethical aspects Income distribution|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$24.88 used (75% off) $80.49 new (19% off) $94.05 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||HB523.O55 2004|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Dominic Martin (2013). The Contained-Rivalry Requirement and a 'Triple Feature' Program for Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 115 (1):167-182.
J. P. Messina (2016). Desert in Liberal Justice: Beyond Institutional Guarantees. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):248-267.
Jan-Willem van der Rijt (2011). Coercive Interference and Moral Judgment. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (5):549 - 567.
Karl Widerquist (2010). The Physical Basis of Voluntary Trade. Human Rights Review 11 (1):83-103.
Jeffrey Moriarty (2013). Smilansky, Arneson, and the Asymmetry of Desert. Philosophical Studies 162 (3):537-545.
Similar books and articles
Alistair MacLeod (2000). Human Dignity, Individual Liberty, And the Free Market Ideal. Social Philosophy Today 16:113-123.
Edward J. Romar (2009). Noble Markets: The Noble/Slave Ethic in Hayek's Free Market Capitalism. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):57 - 66.
Jeffrey Moriarty (2005). Liberty, Desert, and the Market. [REVIEW] Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4):734-735.
Serena Olsaretti (ed.) (2003). Desert and Justice. Oxford University Press.
Benjamin Vilhauer (2009). Free Will Skepticism and Personhood as a Desert Base. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (3):pp. 489-511.
Uskali Mäki (1999). Science as a Free Market: A Reflexivity Test in an Economics of Economics. Perspectives on Science 7 (4):486-509.
Daniel Friedman (2008). Morals and Markets: An Evolutionary Account of the Modern World. Palgrave Macmillan.
Liam Murphy (2007). Liberty, Desert and the Market: A Philosophical Study, Serena Olsaretti, Cambridge University Press, 2004, VIII + 184 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):125-131.
Allen E. Buchanan (1985). Ethics, Efficiency, and the Market. Rowman & Allanheld.
Michael Reber (2010). Distributive Justice and Free Market Economics: A Eudaimonistic Perspective. Libertarian Papers 2.
S. Olsaretti (2013). Coercion and Libertarianism: A Reply to Gordon Barnes. Analysis 73 (2):295-299.
Added to index2011-06-03
Total downloads39 ( #107,928 of 1,911,312 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #142,834 of 1,911,312 )
How can I increase my downloads?