Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (2):143-163 (1998)
|Abstract||The notion of epistemic coherence is interpreted as involving not only consistency but also stability. The problem how to consolidate a belief system, i.e., revise it so that it becomes coherent, is studied axiomatically as well as in terms of set-theoretical constructions. Representation theorems are given for subtractive consolidation (where coherence is obtained by deleting beliefs) and additive consolidation (where coherence is obtained by adding beliefs).|
|Keywords||Belief revision consolidation coherence stability|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Michael Huemer (1997). Probability and Coherence Justification. Southern Journal of Philosophy 35 (4):463-472.
Sven Ove Hansson (2006). Coherence in Epistemology and Belief Revision. Philosophical Studies 128 (1):93 - 108.
Sven Ove Hansson & Erik J. Olsson (1999). Providing Foundations for Coherentism. Erkenntnis 51 (2-3):243-265.
Luca Moretti & Ken Akiba (2007). Probabilistic Measures of Coherence and the Problem of Belief Individuation. Synthese 154 (1):73 - 95.
David Christensen (2000). Diachronic Coherence Versus Epistemic Impartiality. Philosophical Review 109 (3):349-371.
Matthias Hild (1999). The Diachronic Coherence of Ungraded Beliefs. Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):225-242.
Erik J. Olsson (1999). Cohering With. Erkenntnis 50 (2-3):273 - 291.
Peter Murphy, Coherentism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #213,980 of 741,433 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?