Rationality and madness: The post-modern embrace of dionysus and the neo-Ved nta response of Radhakrishnan
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Asian Philosophy 9 (1):39 – 50 (1999)
Following the lead of Nietzsche, several post-modern philosophers challenge the Western notion of rationality and its representational model of thought and embrace the Dionysian element in Nietzsche's philosophy, which can take the form of embracing madness (Foucault), desire (Deleuze and Guattari), or carnival (Kristeva). This paper will place Radhakrishnan into the context of a hermeneutical dialogue with these figures from post-modern philosophy, and it will attempt to address the issue of the post-modem attack on rationality by these post-modern philosophers by comparing their concept of rationality with that espoused by Radhakrishnan. It will also be demonstrated that for Radhakrishnan reason supplies conceptual clarity, is subordinate to intuition, and justifies the validity of intuition which transcends reason. It will be argued that Radhakrishnan agrees with the post-modernist that reason is not universal, but he does not share their radical scepticism as his philosophy seeks wholeness, unity, order, and rationality in conjunction with intuition in contrast to the choice of these post-modernist for diversity, difference, and chaos, and madness.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Allen R. Dyer (1992). Polanyi and Post-Modernism. Tradition and Discovery 19 (1):31-38.
Caroline Guibet Lafaye (2006). Arts postmodernes, philosophie du langage et phénoménologie. Studia Phaenomenologica 6:407-424.
Michael Friedman (2011). Extending the Dynamics of Reason. Erkenntnis 75 (3):431-444.
Arvind Sharma (1999). Jivanmukti in Neo-Hinduism: The Case of Ramana Maharsi. Asian Philosophy 9 (2):93 – 105.
S. Radhakrishnan, G. Parthasarathi & D. P. Chattopadhyaya (eds.) (1989). Radhakrishnan, Centenary Volume. Oxford University Press.
Zhuoyue Huang (2010). Way of Post-Confucianism: Transformation and Genealogy. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):543-559.
Henri Atlan (1998). Paradigms in Immunology and Modern, Post-Modern, Post-Post-Modern, _ Philosophy. A Review of Alfred I. Tauber, the Immune Self: Theory or Metaphor? [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 13 (1):125-131.
Margaret A. Rose (1991). The Post-Modern and the Post-Industrial: A Critical Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Gordon E. Michalson (2004). Re-Reading the Post-Kantian Tradition with Milbank. Journal of Religious Ethics 32 (2):357 - 383.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #179,019 of 1,101,884 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,836 of 1,101,884 )
How can I increase my downloads?