David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt2):165-188 (2009)
Contemporary egalitarian theories of justice constrain the demands of equality by responsibility, and do not view as unjust inequalities that are traceable to individuals' choices. This paper argues that, in order to make non-arbitrary determinate judgements of responsibility, any theory of justice needs a principle of stakes , that is, an account of what consequences choices should have. The paper also argues that the principles of stakes seemingly presupposed by egalitarians are implausible, and that adopting alternative principles of stakes amounts to fleshing out the demands of responsibility rather than imposing limits on them.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Thomas Scanlon (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Elizabeth S. Anderson (1999). What is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109 (2):287-337.
G. A. Cohen (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics 99 (4):906-944.
Richard J. Arneson (1989). Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies 56 (1):77 - 93.
Citations of this work BETA
Muhammad Velji (2015). Change Your Look, Change Your Luck: Religious Self-Transformation and Brute Luck Egalitarianism. Res Philosophica 92 (2):453-471.
Paul Bou-Habib & Serena Olsaretti (2016). Equality of Resources and the Demands of Authenticity. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (4):434-455.
Keith Hyams (2015). Hypothetical Choice, Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons. Utilitas 27 (2):217-239.
Paul Bou-Habib (2011). Racial Profiling and Background Injustice. Journal of Ethics 15 (1/2):33 - 46.
Hugh Lazenby (2014). Luck, Risk and the Market. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):667-680.
Similar books and articles
Mark Coeckelbergh (2012). Moral Responsibility, Technology, and Experiences of the Tragic: From Kierkegaard to Offshore Engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):35-48.
Matt Matravers (2003). Responsibility and Choice. In Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. Frank Cass 77-92.
Matthew Talbert (2011). Unwitting Behavior and Responsibility. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (1):139-152.
Alex Voorhoeve (2005). Equal Opportunity, Equality, and Responsibility. Dissertation, University of London
Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.) (2011). Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
Carl Knight (2010). Justice and the Grey Box of Responsibility. Theoria 57 (124):86-112.
Peter Vallentyne (2006). Hurley on Justice and Responsibility. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 72 (2):433 - 438.
Nicole A. Vincent (2009). What Do You Mean I Should Take Responsibility for My Own Ill Health? Journal of Applied Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):39-51.
Teun J. Dekker (2009). Choices, Consequences and Desert. Inquiry 52 (2):109 – 126.
Added to index2009-07-14
Total downloads106 ( #37,231 of 1,907,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #461,907 of 1,907,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?