David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
The Monist 89 (3):390-417 (2006)
It seems evident that things sometimes get bigger by acquiring new parts. But there is an ancient argument purporting to show that this is impossible: the paradox of increase or growing argument.i Here is a sketch of the paradox. Suppose we have an object, A, and we want to make it bigger by adding a part, B. That is, we want to bring it about that A first lacks and then has B as a part. Imagine, then, that we conjoin B to A in some appropriate way. Never mind what A and B are, or what this conjoining amounts to: let A be anything that can gain a part if anything can gain a part, and let B be the sort of thing that can become a part of A, and suppose we do whatever it would take to make B come to be a part of A if this is possible at all. Have we thereby made B a part of A? It seems not. We seem only to have brought it about that B is attached to A, like this
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kris McDaniel (2010). Parts and Wholes. Philosophy Compass 5 (5):412-425.
Andrew Lore (2011). Solving a Paradox Against Concrete-Composite Christology : A Modified Hylomorphic Proposal. Religious Studies 47 (4):493 - 502.
Similar books and articles
Ken Levy (2009). The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox. Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
Angelika Kratzer (1977). What 'Must' and 'Can' Must and Can Mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.
Emilio Gonzalez-Diaz (2004). Paradox, Time, and de-Paradoxication in Luhmann: No Easy Way Out. World Futures 60 (1 & 2):15 – 27.
Larry S. Temkin (1987). Intransitivity and the Mere Addition Paradox. Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (2):138-187.
L. Nathan Oaklander (2010). Mctaggart's Paradox and Crisp's Presentism. Philosophia 38 (2):229-241.
Branden Fitelson & James Hawthorne (2010). How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens. In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer. 247--275.
Michael Lebuffe (2010). Change and the Eternal Part of the Mind in Spinoza. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (3):369-384.
Branden Fitelson & James Hawthorne (2010). How Bayesian Confirmation Theory Handles the Paradox of the Ravens. In. In Ellery Eells & James Fetzer (eds.), The Place of Probability in Science. Springer. 247--275.
Julia J. Bartkowiak (1993). Trends Toward Part-Time Employment: Ethical Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (10):811 - 815.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads51 ( #30,764 of 1,098,414 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #78,747 of 1,098,414 )
How can I increase my downloads?