Analysis 69 (1):3-9 (2009)
|Abstract||Many philosophers say that time involves a kind of passage that distinguishes it from space. A traditional objection is that this passage would have to occur at some rate, yet we cannot say what the rate would be. The paper argues that the real problem with time’s passage is different: time would have to pass at one second per second, yet this is not a rate of change. This appears to refute decisively not only the view that time passes, but any tensed theory of time|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bradford Skow (2011). Experience and the Passage of Time. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):359-387.
Natalja Deng (2013). Fine's Mctaggart, Temporal Passage, and the a Versus B‐Debate. Ratio 26 (1):19-34.
Zhihua Yao (2007). Four-Dimensional Time in Dzogchen and Heidegger. Philosophy East and West 57 (4):512-532.
Ian Phillips (2009). Rate Abuse: A Reply to Olson. Analysis 69 (3):503-505.
Adrian Bardon (2010). Time-Awareness and Projection in Mellor and Kant. Kant-Studien 101 (1):59-74.
Ned Markosian (1992). On Language and the Passage of Time. Philosophical Studies 66 (1):1 - 26.
Jiri Benovsky (2012). The Causal Efficiency of the Passage of Time. Philosophia 40 (4):763-769.
Steven Savitt (2002). On Absolute Becoming and the Myth of Passage. In Craig Callender (ed.), Time, Reality & Experience.
Ned Markosian (1993). How Fast Does Time Pass? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (4):829-844.
Michael J. Raven (2011). Can Time Pass at the Rate of 1 Second Per Second? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):459-465.
Added to index2009-02-23
Total downloads104 ( #5,666 of 549,007 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #6,001 of 549,007 )
How can I increase my downloads?