David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2007)
From the time of Locke, discussions of personal identity have often ignored the question of our basic metaphysical nature: whether we human people are biological organisms, spatial or temporal parts of organisms, bundles of perceptions, or what have you. The result of this neglect has been centuries of wild proposals and clashing intuitions. What Are We? is the first general study of this important question. It beings by explaining what the question means and how it differs from others, such as questions of personal identity and the mind-body problem. It then examines in some depth the main possible accounts of our metaphysical nature, detailing both their theoretical virtues and the often grave difficulties they face. The book does not endorse any particular account of what we are, but argues that the matter turns on more general issues in the ontology of material things. If composition is universal--if any material things whatever make up something bigger--then we are temporal parts of organisms. If things never compose anything bigger, so that there are only mereological simples, then we too are simples--perhaps the immaterial substances of Descartes--or else we do not exist at all (a view Olson takes very seriously). The intermediate view that some things compose bigger things and others do not leads almost inevitably to the conclusion that we are organisms. So we can discover what we are by working out when composition occurs.
|Keywords||Philosophical anthropology Self (Philosophy Ontology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$33.51 used (35% off) $39.78 new (22% off) $42.05 direct from Amazon (18% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||BD450.O465 2007|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Andrew M. Bailey (2015). Animalism. Philosophy Compass 10 (12):867-883.
Lynne Rudder Baker (2009). Persons and the Extended-Mind Thesis. Zygon 44 (3):642-658.
Aku Visala (2014). Imago Dei, Dualism, and Evolution: A Philosophical Defense of the Structural Image of God. Zygon 49 (1):101-120.
Jonathan Loose (2013). The Metaphysics of Constitution and Accounts of the Resurrection. Philosophy Compass 8 (9):857-865.
Peter Nichols (2010). Substance Concepts and Personal Identity. Philosophical Studies 150 (2):255-270.
Similar books and articles
Ned Markosian (2008). Three Problems for Olson's Account of Personal Identity. Abstracta 3 (3):16-22.
Daniel von Wachter (2000). A World of Fields. In J. Faye, U. Scheffler & M. Urchs (eds.), Things, Facts and Events. Rhodopi 305-326.
Ned Markosian (1998). Brutal Composition. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):211 - 249.
Eric T. Olson (2001). A Compound of Two Substances. In Kevin J. Corcoran (ed.), Soul, Body, and Survival. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Eric T. Olson (1997). The Human Animal: Personal Identity Without Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Eric Olson (forthcoming). Brains. In E Olson (ed.), What Are We? A Study in Personal Ontology. Oxford University Press
Achille C. Varzi (2011). On Doing Ontology Without Metaphysics. Philosophical Perspectives 25 (1):407-423.
Eric T. Olson (2007). What Are We? Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (s 5-6):37-55.
Added to index2010-07-22
Total downloads72 ( #56,040 of 1,790,258 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #50,757 of 1,790,258 )
How can I increase my downloads?