David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Constellations 4 (1):105-123 (1997)
This article analyzes the current political transition in México from the vantage point of civil society. It departs from a definition of the Mexican authoritarian regime, now the oldest in the world, as a model of fusion between the state, the market and society. The crisis of the developmental model and the regime’s increasing inability to incorporate the new social actors created by industrialization and urbanization opened up a long period of political crisis whose main content was a process of societal differentiation. The failure of President Salinas’ project of neo‐liberal reconstruction of the authoritarian regime deepened the crisis and led to the formation and consolidation of strong national political parties, the beginning of a still unequal, but effective electoral competition and especially to the emergence of several civic groups that are struggling for a democratization that goes beyond electoral politics. The collective identity as civil society of these civic groups has been instrumental for the critique of the regime’s gradualist strategy of “permenent electoral reform”
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michaelle L. Browers (2004). Arab Liberalisms: Translating Civil Society, Prioritising Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (1):51-75.
Leonardo Avritzer (1995). Transition to Democracy and Political Culture: An Analysis of the Conflict Between Civil and Political Society In Post-Authoritarian Brazil. Constellations 2 (2):242-267.
Gideon Baker (2001). Civil Society Theory and Republican Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 4 (2):59-84.
Helga Varden (2008). Kant's Non-Voluntarist Conception of Political Obligations: Why Justice is Impossible in the State of Nature. Kantian Review 13 (2):1-45.
Patrick M. Jenlink (2007). Globalization and the Evolution of Democratic Civil Society: Democracy as Spatial Discourse. World Futures 63 (5 & 6):386 – 407.
Philip Oxhorn (2007). Civil Society Without a State? Transnational Civil Society and the Challenge of Democracy in a Globalizing World. World Futures 63 (5 & 6):324 – 339.
Víctor Pérez Díaz (1978). State, Bureaucracy, and Civil Society: A Critical Discussion of the Political Theory of Karl Marx. Macmillan.
Z. A. Pelczynski (ed.) (1984). The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel's Political Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Randall D. Germain & Michael Kenny (eds.) (2005). The Idea of Global Civil Society: Politics and Ethics in a Globalizing Era. Routledge.
Sholomo Avineri (1986). The Paradox of Civil Society in the Structure of Hegel's Views of Sittlichkeit. Philosophy and Theology 1 (2):157-172.
Jonathan Chaplin (2010). Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society. University of Notre Dame Press.
A. Brinton (2012). Association and Recognition in Authoritarian Societies: A Theoretical Beginning. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (3):324-347.
Zev M. Trachtenberg (2005). Geoffrey Brennan and Philip Pettit, The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society:The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society. Ethics 115 (4):809-812.
Ágost Pulszky (1888). The Theory of Law and Civil Society. Hyperion Press.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads18 ( #254,003 of 1,902,528 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #268,990 of 1,902,528 )
How can I increase my downloads?