Graduate studies at Western
Phronesis 45 (3):240-251 (2000)
|Abstract||The first part of this paper traces back to Plotinus a strategy applied by Augustine and Descartes whereby sceptical arguments are used to set aside sensualist forms of dogmatic philosophy, clearing the way for a dogmatism independent of sense-perception which is 'self-authenticating' and thus immune to, and even proven by, sceptical doubt. It is argued that Plotinus already uses this strategy in the opening chapters of "Enneads" V 5 and V 3. The second part of the paper argues that Plotinus' account of how the ineffable One is said (we do not actually say the One, but merely express our own affections) is inspired by the structure of sceptic discourse (the sceptic does not say things as they are, but merely expresses personal affections). Finally, similarities and differences between sceptic discourse about things and Plotinian discourse about the ineffable are explored|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dominic J. O'Meara (2000). Scepticism and Ineffability in Plotinus. Phronesis 45 (3):240 - 251.
Riccardo Chiaradonna (2012). Plotinus' Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense Perception and Discursive Thought. [REVIEW] Topoi 31 (2):191-207.
Dominic J. O'Meara (1993). Plotinus: An Introduction to the Enneads. Oxford University Press.
Annamaria Schiaparelli (2009). Plotinus on Dialectic. Archiv für Geschichte Der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
Robbert van Den Berg (2011). Procheirisis: Porphyry Sent. 16 and Plotinus on the Similes of the Waxen Block and the Aviary. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):163-180.
Rafael Pangilinan (2010). Evil in Plotinus’ Hypostases of Being. Philosophy Pathways (150).
Frans A. J. de Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's Categories? Phronesis 46 (4):492-526.
Frans A. J. De Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's "Categories"? Phronesis 46 (4):492 - 526.
Th G. Sinnige (1984). Gnostic Influences in the Early Works of Plotinus and in Augustine. In David T. Runia (ed.), Plotinus Amid Gnostics and Christians: Papers Presented at the Plotinus Symposium Held at the Free University, Amsterdam, on 25 January 1984. Vu Uitgeverij/Free University Press.
Barrie Fleet (2008). Plotinus and The Presocratics (G.) Stamatellos Plotinus and the Presocractics. A Philosophical Study of Presocratic Influences in Plotinus' Enneads. Pp. Xii + 270. New York: State University of New York Press, 2007. Cased, US$75. ISBN: 978-0-7914-7061-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (02):441-.
Suzanne Stern-Gillet (2000). Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur "Enneas" VI.7.32 et 33. Phronesis 45 (1):38 - 63.
Suzanne Stern-Gillet (2000). Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur Enneas VI.7.32 et 33. Phronesis 45 (1):38-63.
R. Ferwerda (1984). Pity in the Life and Thought of Plotinus. In David T. Runia (ed.), Plotinus Amid Gnostics and Christians: Papers Presented at the Plotinus Symposium Held at the Free University, Amsterdam, on 25 January 1984. Vu Uitgeverij/Free University Press.
I. Crystal (1998). Plotinus on the Structure of Self-Intellection. Phronesis 43 (3):264 - 286.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads12 ( #101,187 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?