David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 160 (3):375 - 395 (2008)
This paper argues that the Husserl–Heidegger relationship is systematically misunderstood when framed in terms of a distinction between internalism and externalism. Both philosophers, it is argued, employ the phenomenological reduction to immanence as a fundamental methodological instrument. After first outlining the assumptions regarding inner and outer and the individual and the social from which recent epistemological interpretations of phenomenology begin, I turn to the question of Husserl’s internalism. I argue that Husserl can only be understood as an internalist on the assumption that immanence equates with internal. This, however, is not the case as can be seen once the reduction is understood not as setting aside the existence of the world, but rather a reflection on its meaning. Turning to Heidegger, I argue that his commitment to a form of the phenomenological reduction precludes him from being either a semantic or a social externalist. The place of authenticity and the first person perspective in his work derive from his phenomenological commitments, which can be seen in his accounts of discourse and language and of falling (Verfallen). I then go on to briefly outline a more plausible basis for understanding the difference between Husserl’s and Heidegger’s phenomenologies in terms of their respective emphases on logic and on poetics.
|Keywords||Phenomenology Husserl Heidegger Reduction|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Robert Bernasconi (1993). Heidegger in Question: The Art of Existing. Humanities Press.
Taylor Carman (2003). Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse, and Authenticity in Being and Time. Cambridge University Press.
Pierre Keller (1999). Husserl and Heidegger on Human Experience. Cambridge University Press.
Cristina Lafont (2005). Was Heidegger an Externalist? Inquiry 48 (6):507 – 532.
Mark Okrent (1988). Heidegger's Pragmatism: Understanding, Being, and the Critique of Metaphysics. Cornell University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
John B. Brough (2008). Consciousness is Not a Bag: Immanence, Transcendence, and Constitution in the Idea of Phenomenology. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (3):177-191.
Dan Zahavi (2008). Internalism, Externalism, and Transcendental Idealism. Synthese 160 (3):355 - 374.
Sebastian Luft (2005). Husserl's Concept of the 'Transcendental Person': Another Look at the Husserl-Heidegger Relationship. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):141 – 177.
Søren Overgaard (2003). Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.
Dan Zahavi (2004). Husserl's Noema and the Internalism-Externalism Debate. Inquiry 47 (1):42 – 66.
Sebastian Luft (2011). Subjectivity and Lifeworld in Transcendental Phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
Steven G. Crowell (2008). Phenomenological Immanence, Normativity, and Semantic Externalism. Synthese 160 (3):335 - 354.
Dermot Moran (2006). Adventures of the Reduction. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):283-293.
James N. McGuirk (2010). Husserl and Heidegger on Reduction and the Question of the Existential Foundations of Rational Life. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (1):31 – 56.
Felix O'Murchadha (2008). Reduction, Externalism and Immanence in Husserl and Heidegger. Synthese 160 (3):375 - 395.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #77,973 of 1,679,387 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #111,749 of 1,679,387 )
How can I increase my downloads?