Environmental Ethics 22 (2):183-190 (2000)
|Abstract||Animal liberationism and environmentalism generally are considered incompatible positions. But, properly conceived, they simply provide answers to different questions, concerning moral standing and intrinsic value, respectively. The two views together constitute an environmental ethic that combines environmental justice and environmental care. I show that this approach is not only consistent but defensible|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Peter Miller (1983). Do Animal Have Interests Worthy of Our Moral Interest? Environmental Ethics 5 (4):319-333.
J. Baird Callicott (1980). Animal Liberation: A Triangular Affair. Environmental Ethics 2 (4):311-338.
Ben A. Minteer (ed.) (2009). Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
John Barry (2004). From Environmental Politics to the Politics of the Environment : The Pacification and Normalization of Environmentalism? In M. L. J. Wissenburg & Yoram Levy (eds.), Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism? Routledge.
M. L. J. Wissenburg & Yoram Levy (eds.) (2004). Liberal Democracy and Environmentalism: The End of Environmentalism? Routledge.
David Lamb (1982). Animal Rights and Liberation Movements. Environmental Ethics 4 (3):215-233.
Edward Johnson (1981). Animal Liberation Versus the Land Ethic. Environmental Ethics 3 (3):265-273.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #274,556 of 548,984 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )
How can I increase my downloads?