A Peculiar “Faith”: On R.G. Collingwood's Use of Saint Anselm's Argument
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Saint Anselm Journal 3 (2):32-47 (2006)
In this paper, I discuss the role of Anselm’s ontological argument in the philosophy of R.G. Collingwood. Anselm’s argument appears prominently in Collingwood’s Essay on Philosophical Method (1933) and Essay on Metaphysics (1940), as well as in his early work Speculum Mentis (1924). In the proof, Collingwood finds the central expression of the priority of “faith” in the first principles of thought to reason’s activities. For Collingwood, it is Anselm’s proof that clearly expresses this relationship between faith and reason. The two elements of this analysis that must be understood if one is to understand Collingwood’s use of the proof are what he means by “the idea of an object that shall completely satisfy the demands of reason” and the “special case of metaphysical thinking.” I analyze both of these elements and conclude by showing how Anselm’s proof is essential to Collingwood’s historical science of mind.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gilbert Ryle (1935). Mr. Collingwood and the Ontological Argument. Mind 44 (174):137-151.
Mark Owen Webb (2005). In Defense of Anselm. Philo 8 (1):55-58.
Gyula Klima, Saint Anselm's Proof: A Problem of Reference, Intentional Identity and Mutual Understanding.
R. G. Collingwood (1927). Reason is Faith Cultivating Itself. Hibbert Journal 26:3-14.
R. G. Collingwood (1929). Faith and Reason. In Albert Augustus David (ed.), God in the Modern World. E.P. Dutton & Co., Inc. 195-230.
Ian Logan (2008). Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Georges Dicker (1988). A Refutation of Rowe's Critique of Anselm's Ontological Argument. Faith and Philosophy 5 (2):193-202.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-12-21
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?