David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1989)
Two centuries after they were published, Kant's ethical writings are as much admired and imitated as they have ever been, yet serious and long-standing accusations of internal incoherence remain unresolved. Onora O'Neill traces the alleged incoherences to attempts to assimilate Kant's ethical writings to modern conceptions of rationality, action and rights. When the temptation to assimilate is resisted, a strikingly different and more cohesive account of reason and morality emerges. Kant offers a "constructivist" vindication of reason and a moral vision in which obligations are prior to rights and in which justice and virtue are linked. O'Neill begins by reconsidering Kant's conceptions of philosophical method, reason, freedom, autonomy and action. She then moves on to the more familiar terrain of interpretation of the Categorical Imperative, while in the last section she emphasizes differences between Kant's ethics and recent "Kantian" ethics, including the work of John Rawls and other contemporary liberal political philosophers.
|Keywords||Ethics, Modern Reason History Act (Philosophy History|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$27.34 used (48% off) $39.90 new (24% off) $43.83 direct from Amazon (16% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||B2799.E8.O54 1989|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Oliver Sensen (2011). Kant's Conception of Inner Value. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):262-280.
Melissa McBay Merritt (2011). Kant's Argument for the Apperception Principle. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):59-84.
Thomas M. Besch (2011). Kantian Constructivism, the Issue of Scope, and Perfectionism: O'Neill on Ethical Standing. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):1-20.
Alison Hills (2008). Kantian Value Realism. Ratio 21 (2):182–200.
Ido Geiger (2010). What is the Use of the Universal Law Formula of the Categorical Imperative? British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2):271 – 295.
Similar books and articles
Lara Ostaric (2009). Kant's Account of Nature's Systematicity and the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason. Inquiry 52 (2):155 – 178.
John H. Zammito (2008). Kant's "Naturalistic" History of Mankind? Some Reservations. Journal of the Philosophy of History 2 (1):29-62.
Andrews Reath (2010). Formal Principles and the Form of a Law. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Roger J. Sullivan (1989). Immanuel Kant's Moral Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Carol W. Voeller (2001). The Metaphysics of the Moral Law: Kant's Deduction of Freedom. Garland Pub..
Immanuel Kant (1909/2004). Critique of Practical Reason. Dover Publications.
Sergio Tenenbaum (2012). The Idea of Freedom and Moral Cognition in Groundwork III. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):555-589.
Pauline Kleingeld (1998). Kant on the Unity of Theoretical and Practical Reason. Review of Metaphysics 52 (2):500-528.
Susan Neiman (1994). The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads105 ( #8,125 of 1,088,907 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #17,287 of 1,088,907 )
How can I increase my downloads?