David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Heythrop Journal 52 (1):1-10 (2011)
Although recent scholarship has begun to clarify Porphyry’s position on the first principle in its distinction from that of Plotinus we must be careful not to gloss over the crucial ramifications of Porphyry’s developments. The Plotinian One is beyond Being, and thus beyond all relation and difference. In his attempt to understand how such a principle can be productive of all else that follows from it, Porphyry considers the Plotinian One in both its transcendent and creative aspects, introducing the notions of difference and self-relation within the One itself. Porphyry’s modifications of Plotinus’s doctrine, however, result in a first principle having a character utterly distinct from what Plotinus envisioned, and from what I believe Plotinus would have accepted. Because Porphyry’s first principle is relational, it loses its decisive Plotinian character as absolutely transcendent. This distinction between the first principles of Porphyry and Plotinus has important ramifications for each of their philosophical itineria, and further strengthens the status of Plotinus within the Neoplatonic tradition. Plotinus is a unique thinker within the Neoplatonic tradition, and we must be careful not to equate Neoplatonism with Plotinus, when in fact, it is Plotinus who against both his own predecessors and successors often stands alone.
|Keywords||Plotinus Porphyry Henosis The One|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Frans A. J. de Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's Categories? Phronesis 46 (4):492-526.
Frans A. J. De Haas (2001). Did Plotinus and Porphyry Disagree on Aristotle's "Categories"? Phronesis 46 (4):492 - 526.
Porphyry (1988). Porphyry's Launching-Points to the Realm of Mind: An Introduction to the Neoplatonic Philosophy of Plotinus. Phanes Press.
Robbert van den Berg (2010). Procheirisis: Porphyry Sent. 16 and Plotinus on the Similes of the Waxen Block and the Aviary. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):163-180.
John Dillon (2010). Intellect and the One in Porphyrys Sententiae. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (1):27-35.
Andrew Smith (1974). Porphyry's Place in the Neoplatonic Tradition: A Study in Post-Plotinian Neoplatonism. M. Nijhoff.
John Granger Cook (2008). Porphyry's Attempted Demolition of Christian Allegory. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 2 (1):1-27.
Porphyry (2003). Porphyry Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Porphyry (1986). Porphyry's Letter to His Wife Marcella Concerning the Life of Philosophy and the Ascent to the Gods. Phanes Press.
Porphyry (1938). Porphyry's Introduction to the Predicaments of Aristotle. Annapolis, the St. John's Press.
J. Phillips (2003). Numenian Psychology in Calcidius? Phronesis 48 (2):132 - 151.
John Phillips (2003). Numenian Psychology in Calcidius? Phronesis 48 (2):132-151.
Riin Sirkel (2011). Alexander of Aphrodisias's Account of Universals and its Problems. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (3):297-314.
Added to index2011-09-07
Total downloads30 ( #126,033 of 1,789,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #167,785 of 1,789,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?