David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):575-596 (2003)
Logical positivism is widely associated with an illiberal technocratic view of politics. This view is a caricature. Some members of the left Vienna circle were explicit in their criticism of this conception of politics. In particular, Neurath's work attempted to link the internal epistemological pluralism and tolerance of logical empiricism with political pluralism and the rejection of a technocratic politics. This paper examines the role that unified science played in Neurath's defence of political and social pluralism. Neurath's project of unified science addressed problems that lie at the centre of recent debates around liberalism concerning the possibility of social co-operation in conditions of pluralism. His response is distinctive in calling upon an empiricist tradition that differs from Kantian proceduralist approaches that have predominated in recent liberalism. While Neurath's position has problems, it deserves reconsideration, especially in so far as it questions the Kantian assumption that a thin language of abstract rights provides the best basis for the cosmopolital lingua franca required by conditions of social pluralism. An investigation of the role that unified science plays in Neurath's politics also gives reasons for revising common misconceptions about the nature of the unity of science programme itself.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Bruce Ackerman (1990). Neutralities. In R. Bruce Douglass, Gerald M. Mara & Henry S. Richardson (eds.), Liberalism and the Good. Routledge. 37.
Jonathan Dancy (1995). In Defense of Thick Concepts. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):263-279.
P. T. Geach (1956). Good and Evil. Analysis 17 (2):33 - 42.
Otto Neurath (1946). After Six Years. Synthese 5 (1-2):77 - 82.
Otto Neurath (1946). The Orchestration of the Sciences by the Encyclopedism of Logical Empiricism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 6 (4):496-508.
Citations of this work BETA
Donata Romizi (2012). The Vienna Circle’s “Scientific World-Conception”: Philosophy of Science in the Political Arena. Hopos 2 (2):205-242.
Thomas Uebel (2010). What's Right About Carnap, Neurath and the Left Vienna Circle Thesis: A Refutation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (2):214-221.
Similar books and articles
Glen Newey (2001). After Politics: The Rejection of Politics in Contemporary Liberal Philosophy. Palgrave.
Craig L. Carr (2010). Liberalism and Pluralism: The Politics of E Pluribus Unum. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kathleen Okruhlik (2004). Logical Empiricism, Feminism, and Neurath's Auxiliary Motive. Hypatia 19 (1):48-72.
A. Ferrara (2010). Reflexive Pluralism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (3-4):353-364.
Nancy Cartwright (ed.) (1996). Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. Cambridge University Press.
George A. Reisch (1998). Pluralism, Logical Empiricism, and the Problem of Pseudoscience. Philosophy of Science 65 (2):333-348.
F. Freyenhagen (2011). Taking Reasonable Pluralism Seriously: An Internal Critique of Political Liberalism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):323-342.
T. Mormann (1997). Review. Otto Neurath: Philosophy Between Science and Politics. N Cartwright, J Cat, L Fleck & TE Uebel. Overcoming Logical Positivism From Within: The Emergence of Neurath's Naturalism in the Vienna Circle Protocol Sentence Debate. TE Uebel. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):306-309.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads23 ( #88,918 of 1,692,753 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #108,995 of 1,692,753 )
How can I increase my downloads?