The Opposition of Politics and War

Hypatia 23 (2):141-154 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

At stake for this essay is the distinction between politics and war and the extent to which politics can survive war. Gender analysis reveals how high these stakes are by revealing the complexity of militarism. It also reveals the impossibility of gender identity as foundation for a more robust politics with respect to war. Instead, a non-ideal normative differentiation among kinds of violence is affirmed as that which politically cannot not be wanted.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The paradox of persisting opposition.Robert E. Goodin - 2002 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1 (1):109-146.
The Opposition of Politics and War.Bat-ami Bar On - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (2):141-154.
The square of opposition — a new approach.H. Greniewski - 1953 - Studia Logica 1 (1):297-301.
The Opposition of Politics and War.Bat-Ami Bar On - 2008 - Hypatia 23 (2):141-154.
Jacques Rancière and the problem of pure politics.Samuel A. Chambers - 2011 - European Journal of Political Theory 10 (3):303-326.
Imaginal politics.Chiara Bottici - 2011 - Thesis Eleven 106 (1):56-72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
39 (#379,248)

6 months
8 (#241,888)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The law of peoples.John Rawls - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. Edited by John Rawls.
The Law of Peoples.John Rawls - 1993 - Critical Inquiry 20 (1):36-68.

View all 21 references / Add more references