David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):131-151 (2006)
The paper uses a comparison of Levinas and Adorno to raise certain questions about the former's thought. Both thinkers utilize Jewish experience as a trope for what eludes systematic conceptualization (particularly the conceptualization of history): the universalization and varying degrees of abstraction required to make this move form the content of the paper's central analysis. However, this analysis is framed in a wider argument about the way in which Levinas is an innovative thinker, the problems this innovation raises for the question of the eternal relevance of his ideas, and the influence a unique aspect of his thought has had on contemporary philosophers who seek to update him.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Asher Howoritz (2002). 'By a Hair's Breadth': Critique, Transcendence and the Ethical in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 28 (2).
Sarah Hammerschlag (2010). The Figural Jew: Politics and Identity in Postwar French Thought. The University of Chicago Press.
Dan Webb (2009). `If Adorno Isn't the Devil, It's Because He's a Jew': Lyotard's Misreading of Adorno Through Thomas Mann's Dr Faustus. Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (5):517-531.
Hent de Vries (2005). Minimal Theologies: Critiques of Secular Reason in Adorno and Levinas. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Nick Smith (2007). Adorno Vs. Levinas: Evaluating Points of Contention. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.
Nick Smith (2008). Questions for a Reluctant Jurisprudence of Alterity. In Desmond Manderson (ed.), Essays on Levinas and Law: A Mosaic. Palgrave Macmillan
Espen Hammer (2000). Adorno and Extreme Evil. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (4):75-93.
Carl Sachs (2011). The Acknowledgement of Transcendence: Anti-Theodicy in Adorno and Levinas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):273-294.
Oona Eisenstadt (2006). Levinas and Adorno: Universalizing the Jew After Auschwitz. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 14 (1):131-151.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #203,584 of 1,796,455 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #466,501 of 1,796,455 )
How can I increase my downloads?