Arguing About Gods
Cambridge University Press (2006)
| Abstract | Graham Oppy examines contemporary arguments for and against the existence of God. He shows that none of these arguments are persuasive enough to change the minds of those participants on the question of the existence of God. His conclusion is supported by detailed analyses of contemporary arguments, as well as by the development of a theory about the purpose of arguments, and the criteria that should be used in judging whether or not an argument is successful. Oppy discusses the work of a wide array of philosophers, including Anselm, Aquinas, Descartes, Locke, Leibniz, Kant and Hume, and more recently, Plantinga, Dembski, White, Dawkins, Bergman, Gale, and Pruss. | |||||||||
| Keywords | God Proof | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Buy the book | $93.69 new (29% off) $98.62 direct from Amazon (25% off) Amazon page | |||||||||
| Call number | BT103.O67 2006 | |||||||||
| ISBN(s) | 0521863864 9780521863865 | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesDavid Twetten (2006). On Which 'God' Should Be the Target of a 'Proof of God's Existence'. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 8:75-80.
Ghislain Guigon (2011). Merely Possible Explanation. Religious Studies 47 (3):359-370.
Richard M. Gale (1991). On the Nature and Existence of God. Cambridge University Press.
Richard Messer (1993). Does God's Existence Need Proof? Oxford University Press.
Graham Oppy (2010). Langtry on God, the Best and Evil. Sophia 49 (4):591-601.
Graham Robert Oppy (1995). Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. Cambridge University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,806 of 549,694 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,694 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
