David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 68 (1):183-199 (2010)
There has been a recent explosion of interest in the epistemology of disagreement. Much of the recent literature is concerned with a particular range of puzzle cases (discussed in the Cases section of my paper). Almost all of the papers that contribute to that recent literature make mention of questions about religious disagreement in ways that suggest that there are interesting connections between those puzzle cases and real life cases of religious disagreement. One important aim of my paper is to cast doubt on that suggestion. More generally, the aim of my paper is to give a reasonably full account of the recent literature on the epistemology of disagreement, and then to give a serious discussion of some of the epistemological issues that are raised by real world religious disagreements.
|Keywords||Disagreement Doxastic peer Epistemology of disagreement Reasonable disagreement Religious disagreement Shared evidence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Christensen (2007). Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News. Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Adam Elga (2007). Reflection and Disagreement. Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Gilbert Harman (1986). Change in View. MIT Press.
Richard Feldman (2006). Epistemological Puzzles About Disagreement. In Stephen Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures. Oxford University Press 216-236.
David Christensen (2009). Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):756-767.
Citations of this work BETA
Robert Mark Simpson (2013). Epistemic Peerhood and the Epistemology of Disagreement. Philosophical Studies 164 (2):561-577.
David M. Holley (2013). Religious Disagreements and Epistemic Rationality. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):33-48.
Similar books and articles
Amir Konigsberg (2012). The Problem with Uniform Solutions to Peer Disagreement. Theoria 79 (1):96-126.
Carlo Martini (2013). A Puzzle About Belief Updating. Synthese 190 (15):3149-3160.
Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes (2014). Disagreement Without Error. Erkenntnis 79 (1):143-154.
Michael Thune (2010). Religious Belief and the Epistemology of Disagreement. Philosophy Compass 5 (8):712-724.
Dan López de Sa (2010). How to Respond to Borderline Cases. In Sebastiano Moruzzi & Richard Dietz (eds.), Cuts and Clouds. Oxford University Press
David Enoch (2010). Not Just a Truthometer: Taking Oneself Seriously (but Not Too Seriously) in Cases of Peer Disagreement. Mind 119 (476):953 - 997.
Robin McKenna (2012). Epistemic Contextualism, Epistemic Relativism and Disagreement. Philosophical Writings.
Tomas Bogardus (2013). Disagreeing with the (Religious) Skeptic. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):5-17.
Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes (2012). Varieties of Disagreement and Predicates of Taste. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (1):167-181.
Joshua C. Thurow (2012). Does Religious Disagreement Actually Aid the Case for Theism? In Jake Chandler & Victoria Harrison (eds.), Probability in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford
Dennis Potter (2013). Religious Disagreement: Internal and External. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):21-31.
John K. Davis (2010). An Alternative to Relativism. Philosophical Topics 38 (2):17-37.
Don Fawkes (2006). Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
Brian Ribeiro (2011). Philosophy and Disagreement. Critica 43 (127):3-25.
Added to index2010-11-18
Total downloads185 ( #19,608 of 1,911,757 )
Recent downloads (6 months)37 ( #21,345 of 1,911,757 )
How can I increase my downloads?