Gödelian ontological arguments
Analysis 56 (4):226–230 (1996)
| Abstract | There is now a considerable secondary literature on Godel's ontological arguments; in particular, interested readers should consult Sobel (1987), Anderson (1990) and Adams (1995). In this note, I wish to draw attention to an objection to these arguments which has hitherto gone unnoticed. This objection does not depend upon fine details of the formulation of the arguments; I arbitrarily choose to develop the objection in connection with the formulation provided by Anderson | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesC. Anthony Anderson (1990). Some Emendations of Gödel's Ontological Proof. Faith and Philosophy 7 (3):291-303.
Taner Edis (1998). How Godel's Theorem Supports the Possibility of Machine Intelligence. Minds and Machines 8 (2):251-262.
Yujin Nagasawa (2010). The Ontological Argument and the Devil. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (238):72-91.
Graham Robert Oppy (1995). Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. Cambridge University Press.
Yuval Steinitz (1994). Contradictions Are Ontological Arguments. Religious Studies 30 (4):505 - 509.
Graham Oppy (2008). Higher-Order Ontological Arguments. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.
Thomas Metcalf (2005). Entailment and Ontological Arguments. Philo 8 (2):131-133.
Graham Oppy (1996). Godelian Ontological Arguments. Analysis 56 (4):226-230.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,183 of 549,533 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,418 of 549,533 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
