Graduate studies at Western
Biology and Philosophy 11 (4):519-534 (1996)
|Abstract||There seems to be a widespread conviction — evidenced, for example, in the work of Mackie, Dawkins and Sober — that it is Darwinian rather than Humean considerations which deal the fatal logical blow to arguments for intelligent design. I argue that this conviction cannot be well-founded. If there are current logically decisive objections to design arguments, they must be Humean — for Darwinian considerations count not at all against design arguments based upon apparent cosmological fine-tuning. I argue, further, that there are good Humean reasons for atheists and agnostics to resist the suggestion that apparent design — apparent biological design and/or apparent cosmological fine-tuning — establishes (or even strongly supports) the hypothesis of intelligent design.|
|Keywords||Hume Darwin Dawkins Sober Mackie Penrose argument for design biological design cosmological fine-tuning world ensemble chance theism God|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Mark A. Walker & M. Milan (2006). Astrophysical Fine Tuning, Naturalism, and the Contemporary Design Argument. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):285 – 307.
Neil A. Manson (2009). The Fine-Tuning Argument. Philosophy Compass 4 (1):271-286.
Graham Wood (2006). The Fine-Tuning Argument: The ‘Design Inference’ Version. Religious Studies 42 (4):467-471.
Ted Poston & Trent Dougherty (2008). A User's Guide to Design Arguments. Religious Studies 44 (1):99 - 110.
Trent Dougherty & Ted Poston (2008). A User's Guide to Design Arguments. Religious Studies 44 (1):99-110.
Bruce H. Weber (2011). Design and its Discontents. Synthese 178 (2):271 - 289.
Elliott Sober (2004). The Design Argument. In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Pub..
Jonathan Weisberg (2005). Firing Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (4):809-821.
David Glass (2012). Darwin, Design and Dawkins' Dilemma. Sophia 51 (1):31-57.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads29 ( #48,129 of 739,346 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,538 of 739,346 )
How can I increase my downloads?