Maydole's 2QS5 Argument
Philo 7 (2):203-211 (2004)
| Abstract | This paper is a reply to Robert Maydole’s “The Modal Perfection Argument for the Existence of a Supreme Being,” published in Philo 6, 2, 2003. I argue that Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument fails, and that there is no evident way in which it can be repaired | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGraham Oppy (2007). Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument (Again). Philo: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):72-84.
Robert Maydole (2005). On Metcalf 's Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument. Philo 8 (2):123-130.
Robert Maydole (2005). On Metcalf 's Objections to the Modal Perfection Argument. Philo 8 (2):123-130.
Robert Maydole (2003). The Modal Perfection Argument for the Existence of a Supreme Being. Philo 6 (2):299-313.
Thomas Metcalf (2005). Entailment and Ontological Arguments. Philo 8 (2):131-133.
Robert E. Maydole (1980). A Modal Model for Proving the Existence of God. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (2):135 - 142.
Robert E. Maydole (2000). The Modal Third Way. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47 (1):1-28.
Graham Oppy (2002). Paley's Argument for Design. Philo 5 (2):161-173.
Graham Oppy (2008). Higher-Order Ontological Arguments. Philosophy Compass 3 (5):1066-1078.
Robert E. Maydole (1975). Paradoxes and Many-Valued Set Theory. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4 (4):269 - 291.
Agnieszka Rostalska & Rafal Urbaniak (2009). Swinburne's Modal Argument for the Existence of a Soul. Philo 12 (1):73-87.
Brian Leftow (2002). Anselm's Neglected Argument. Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
Peter van Inwagen (2009). Some Remarks on the Modal Ontological Argument. Philo 12 (2):217-227.
Brendan O'sullivan (2010). Taking Referentialism Seriously: A Response to the Modal Argument. Theoria 76 (1):54-67.
Michael Papazian (2007). The Ontological Argument of Diogenes of Babylon. Phronesis 52 (2):188-209.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-02-24Total downloads16 ( #74,564 of 548,974 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,799 of 548,974 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
