Maydole's 2QS5 Argument

Philo 7 (2):203-211 (2004)
Abstract
This paper is a reply to Robert Maydole’s “The Modal Perfection Argument for the Existence of a Supreme Being,” published in Philo 6, 2, 2003. I argue that Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument fails, and that there is no evident way in which it can be repaired.
Keywords ontological argument  modal perfection  God  theism  Maydole  existence of God  argument for existence of God  higher-order ontological argument  modal ontological argument
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/philo20047217
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Graham Oppy, Maydole's 2QS5 Argument
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Graham Oppy (2009). Pruss's Ontological Arguments. Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-02-24

Total downloads

43 ( #97,131 of 1,907,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

13 ( #49,342 of 1,907,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.