On some alleged consequences of 'the Hartle Hawking cosmology' (1997)
| Abstract | In [3], Quentin Smith claims that `the Hartle Hawking cosmology' is inconsistent with classical theism in a way which redounds to the discredit of classical theism; and, moreover, that the truth of `the Hartle Hawking cosmology' would undermine reasonsed belief in any other varieties of theism which hold that the universe is created. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
William Lane Craig (1993). Theism, Atheism, and Big Bang Cosmology. Oxford University Press.
Ernan McMullin (2005). Anthropic Explanation in Cosmology. Faith and Philosophy 22 (5):601-614.
Quentin Smith (1994). Stephen Hawking's Cosmology and Theism. Analysis 54 (4):236-243.
Daniel Murphy (2008). Quantum Cosmology and Theism. Philo 11 (1):93-119.
Quentin Smith (1998). Why Stephen Hawking's Cosmology Precludes a Creator. Philo 1 (1):75-93.
Hans Halvorson (forthcoming). Theism and Physical Cosmology. In Charles Taliaferro, Victoria Harrison & Stewart Goetz (eds.), Routledge Companion to Theism.
Robert J. Deltete & Reed A. Guy (1997). Hartle-Hawking Cosmology and Unconditional Probabilities. Analysis 57 (4):304–315.
William Lane Craig (1997). Hartle-Hawking Cosmology and Atheism. Analysis 57 (4):291 - 295.
Ned Markosian (1995). On the Argument From Quantum Cosmology Against Theism. Analysis 55 (4):247-251.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-06-12Total downloads24 ( #51,675 of 549,117 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,740 of 549,117 )How can I increase my downloads? |

