Paley’s Argument Revisited: Reply to Schupbach

Philosophia Christi 10 (2):443-450 (2008)
Abstract
This paper is a reply to Jonah Schupbach's critique of a previous paper of mine on Paley's argument for design. (Bibliographical details for earlier publications are available in the paper.)
Keywords Philosophy of religion  Arguments about the existence of God  Argument for design  Paley  Darwin  Theism  Schupbach  Teleological argument  Paley's Watch
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive Graham Oppy, Paley’s Argument Revisited: Reply to Schupbach
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Andre Ariew (2007). Teleology. In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-21

Total downloads

29 ( #136,643 of 1,906,977 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

18 ( #36,372 of 1,906,977 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.