Response to Gettings

Analysis 60 (4):363–367 (2000)
In this paper, I repair an error in my earlier paper on Godel's ontological argument. I also reply to criticisms of my earlier paper by Mike Gettings. (All relevant bibliographical information is supplied in the article.)
Keywords ontological argument  Godel  Gaunilo  Gettings  Godel's ontological argument  Leibniz  higher-order ontological argument  theism  God  parody
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-8284.00256
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 17,859
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Graham Oppy (2009). Pruss's Ontological Arguments. Religious Studies 45 (3):355-363.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #223,479 of 1,781,480 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #167,885 of 1,781,480 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.