David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
At p.23, Leftow argues that, as a matter of physical necessity, no parcel of matter follows a discontinuous spatial path. He then uses this conclusion as a premise in a further argument to the conclusion that no non-theistic scenarios involving contingently existing entities could yield a sure way to gain evidence that a second time series exists. I think that there may be non-theistic scenarios involving contingently existing entities which yield ways of gaining evidence of other time series -- it could be for example that our best theories about the very early universe entail that there are many disconnected regions of spacetime, each with its own time series -- so I think that the further argument cannot be any good. However, the point I want to insist on here is that his argument for the conclusion that, as a matter of physical necessity no parcel of matter follows a discontinuous spatial path, is seriously flawed.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Needham (2010). Transient Things and Permanent Stuff. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (1):147 – 166.
Bruce Baugh (2011). Time, Duration and Eternity in Spinoza. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):211-233.
Brian Leftow (1990). Aquinas on Time and Eternity. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64 (3):387-399.
Gordon Belot (2005). Dust, Time and Symmetry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):255 - 291.
William Lane Craig (2000). Omniscience, Tensed Facts and Divine Eternity. Faith and Philosophy 17 (2):227--228.
Mark T. Nelson (1996). Who Are the Best Judges of Theistic Arguments? Sophia 35 (2):1-12.
David H. Sanford (1968). McTaggart on Time. Philosophy 43 (166):371 - 378.
Helen S. Lang (2005). Perpetuity, Eternity, and Time in Proclus' Cosmos. Phronesis 50 (2):150 - 169.
Graham Oppy (1993). Modal Theistic Arguments. Sophia 32 (2):17-24.
Added to index2009-06-12
Total downloads21 ( #82,692 of 1,102,744 )
Recent downloads (6 months)8 ( #29,556 of 1,102,744 )
How can I increase my downloads?