David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Phronesis 46 (2):154-188 (2001)
In "De malorum subsistentia" chs 30-7, Proclus criticizes the view that evil is to be identified with matter. His main target is Plotinus' account in Enn. I,8 . Proclus denies that matter is the cause of evil in the soul, and that it is evil or a principle of evil. According to Proclus, matter is good, because it is produced by the One. Plotinus' doctrine of matter-evil is the result of a different conception of emanation, according to which matter does not revert to its principle. Proclus claims that to posit a principle of evil either amounts to a coarse dualism, or makes the Good ultimately responsible for evil. Plotinus does not seem to be able to escape the latter consequence, if he is to remain committed to the Neoplatonic conception of causation. Plotinus equated matter with privation and said it is a kind of non-being that is the contrary of substance, thus violating fundamental Aristotelian tenets. Proclus reinstates Aristotelian orthodoxy, as does Simplicius in his "Commentary on the Categories." It is possible that lamblichus was the source of both Proclus and Simplicius, and that he was the originator of the parhypostasis theory and the inventor of the anti-Plotinian arguments
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Filip Ivanovic (2014). The Eternally and Uniquely Beautiful: Dionysius the Areopagite’s Understanding of the Divine Beauty. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (3):188-204.
Similar books and articles
Jan Opsomer (2001). Proclus Vs Plotinus on Matter ("De Mal. Subs." 30-7). Phronesis 46 (2):154 - 188.
Rafael Pangilinan (2010). Evil in Plotinus’ Hypostases of Being. Philosophy Pathways (150).
Christian Schäfer (2004). Matter in Plotinus's Normative Ontology. Phronesis 49 (3):266 - 294.
Christian Schäfer (2004). Matter in Plotinus's Normative Ontology. Phronesis 49 (3):266-294.
John Phillips (2007). Order From Disorder: Proclus' Doctrine of Evil and its Roots in Ancient Platonism. Brill.
Gerd van Riel (2001). Horizontalism or Verticalism? Proclus Vs Plotinus on the Procession of Matter. Phronesis 46 (2):129-153.
Gerd Van Riel (2001). Horizontalism or Verticalism? Proclus Vs Plotinus on the Procession of Matter. Phronesis 46 (2):129-153.
Gerd Van Riel (2001). Horizontalism or Verticalism? Proclus Vs Plotinus on the Procession of Matter. Phronesis 46 (2):129 - 153.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45 - 71.
Denis O'Brien (1999). La matière chez Plotin: son origine, sa nature. Phronesis 44 (1):45-71.
Kevin Corrigan (1996). Plotinus' Theory of Matter-Evil and the Question of Substance: Plato, Aristototle, and Alexander of Aphrodisias. Peeters.
Denis OBrien (2011). Plotinus on the Making of Matter Part I: The Identity of Darkness. International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (1):6-57.
Gary M. Gurtler (1998). Plotinus (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 36 (1):128-130.
Danielle A. Layne (2009). Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13 (2):347-362.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads29 ( #108,149 of 1,725,989 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,725,989 )
How can I increase my downloads?