David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Word recognition performance varies systematically as a function of where the eyes fixate in the word. Performance is maximal with the eye slightly left of the center of the word, and decreases drastically to both sides of this 'Optimal Viewing Position'. While manipulations of lexical factors have only marginal effects on this phenomenon, previous studies have pointed to a relation between the viewing position effect and letter legibility: When letter legibility drops, the viewing position effect becomes more exaggerated. To further investigate this phenomenon, we improved letter legibility by magnifying letter size in a way that was proportional to the..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Richard Shillcock & Padraic Monaghan (1999). Bihemispheric Representation, Foveal Splitting, and Visual Word Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (2):300-301.
Geoffrey Underwood (2003). Where to Look Next? The Missing Landing Position Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):505-506.
Tali Bitan & James R. Booth (2012). Offline Improvement in Learning to Read a Novel Orthography Depends on Direct Letter Instruction. Cognitive Science 36 (5):896-918.
Matthew Brown & Derek Besner (2002). Semantic Priming: On the Role of Awareness in Visual Word Recognition in the Absence of an Expectancy. Consciousness and Cognition 11 (3):402-422.
Paul Edward Dutton (2005). Filiolitas. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (4):549-566.
Sophie Dufour, Angèle Brunellière & Ulrich H. Frauenfelder (2013). Tracking the Time Course of Word‐Frequency Effects in Auditory Word Recognition With Event‐Related Potentials. Cognitive Science 37 (3):489-507.
Sid Kouider & Emmanuel Dupoux (2001). A Functional Disconnection Between Spoken and Visual Word Recognition: Evidence From Unconscious Priming. Cognition 82 (1):35- 49.
Janet H. Hsiao & Sze Man Lam (2013). The Modulation of Visual and Task Characteristics of a Writing System on Hemispheric Lateralization in Visual Word Recognition—A Computational Exploration. Cognitive Science 37 (5):861-890.
M. Gareth Gaskell (2000). Modeling Lexical Effects on Phonetic Categorization and Semantic Effects on Word Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):329-330.
Eyal M. Reingold (2003). Eye-Movement Control in Reading: Models and Predictions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):500-501.
Kant (2009). Marcus Herz: First Letter (1770) / Herz ; Second Letter (1771) / Kant ; Third Letter (1771) / Herz ; Observations From Speculative Philosophy (1771) / Herz ; Fourth Letter (1772) ; Fifth Letter (1776). In Eric Watkins (ed.), Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press.
Man-Ying Wang & Chi-Le Ching (2009). Recognition Intent and Visual Word Recognition☆. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):65-77.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads10 ( #148,771 of 1,103,046 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #84,821 of 1,103,046 )
How can I increase my downloads?