Graduate studies at Western
Ethics and Behavior 7 (2):163 – 171 (1997)
|Abstract||Laboratory animals, being vulnerable subjects, need the protection provided by adequate ethical review. This review falls primarily to Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees. A review committee's first duty is to identify which procedures ethically are unacceptable irrespective of any knowledge that might be derived. Examples are provided. These projects should be disapproved. Then, "on balance" judgments are assessed that weigh the animal harms against the potential benefits to humans. Several countries (but not the United States) use a classification system for ranking the degree of animal pain and distress. This type of assessment is essential for careful ethical analysis. Another way to enhance ethical discussion is to strive for a more balanced perspective of different viewpoints among members of decision making committees. Inclusion of representatives of animal welfare organizations and a greater proportion on nonanimal researchers would likely achieve this objective.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
C. R. W. Spedding (2000). Animal Welfare. Earthscan Publications.
Roman Kolar (2006). Animal Experimentation. Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):111-122.
Lawrence Finsen (1988). Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: A New Set of Clothes for the Emperor? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 13 (2):145-158.
Raymond Anthony (2007). Animal Welfare, Trust, Governance, and the Public Good. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:275-280.
Kirsten Schmidt (2011). Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):153-171.
Georges Chapouthier & Jean-Claude Nouët (eds.) (1998). The Universal Declaration of Animal Rights: Comments and Intentions. Ligue Française des Droits De L'Animal.
David J. Mellor (2009). The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kelly Oliver (2010). Animal Ethics: Toward an Ethics of Responsiveness. Research in Phenomenology 40 (2):267-280.
Donald A. Saucier & Mary E. Cain (2006). The Foundations of Attitudes About Animal Research. Ethics and Behavior 16 (2):117 – 133.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads6 ( #154,770 of 731,534 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 731,534 )
How can I increase my downloads?