Relational proof system for relevant logics
Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440 (1992)
| Abstract | A method is presented for constructing natural deduction-style systems for propositional relevant logics. The method consists in first translating formulas of relevant logics into ternary relations, and then defining deduction rules for a corresponding logic of ternary relations. Proof systems of that form are given for various relevant logics. A class of algebras of ternary relations is introduced that provides a relation-algebraic semantics for relevant logics | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Configure |
Ross T. Brady (1993). Rules in Relevant Logic — II: Formula Representation. Studia Logica 52 (4):565 - 585.
André Fuhrmann & Edwin D. Mares (1994). On S. Studia Logica 53 (1):75 - 91.
Lou Goble (2007). Combinatory Logic and the Semantics of Substructural Logics. Studia Logica 85 (2):171 - 197.
Wendy MacCaull & Ewa Orłlowska (2002). Correspondence Results for Relational Proof Systems with Application to the Lambek Calculus. Studia Logica 71 (3):389-414.
Gemma Robles & José M. Méndez (2010). A Routley-Meyer Type Semantics for Relevant Logics Including B R Plus the Disjunctive Syllogism. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (2).
Greg Restall (1998). Displaying and Deciding Substructural Logics 1: Logics with Contraposition. Journal of Philosophical Logic 27 (2):179-216.
Robert Goldblatt & Michael Kane (2010). An Admissible Semantics for Propositionally Quantified Relevant Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (1).
Luca Viganò (2000). Labelled Non-Classical Logics. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |

