Synthese 190 (11):1937-1954 (2013)
|Abstract||In this article we argue that philosophy can facilitate improvement in cross-disciplinary science. In particular, we discuss in detail the Toolbox Project, an effort in applied epistemology that deploys philosophical analysis for the purpose of enhancing collaborative, cross-disciplinary scientific research through improvements in cross-disciplinary communication. We begin by sketching the scientific context within which the Toolbox Project operates, a context that features a growing interest in and commitment to cross-disciplinary research (CDR). We then develop an argument for the leading idea behind this effort, namely, that philosophical dialogue can improve cross-disciplinary science by effecting epistemic changes that lead to better group communication. On the heels of this argument, we describe our approach and its output; in particular, we emphasize the Toolbox instrument that generates philosophical dialogue and the Toolbox workshop in which that dialogue takes place. Together, these constitute a philosophical intervention into the life of CDR teams. We conclude by considering the philosophical implications of this intervention|
|Keywords||Toolbox Project Philosophical intervention Applied epistemology Cross-disciplinary research Collaboration Communication|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jens Aagaard-Hansen & Uno Svedin (2009). Quality Issues in Cross-Disciplinary Research: Towards a Two-Pronged Approach to Evaluation. Social Epistemology 23 (2):165 – 176.
Uno Svedin & Jens Aagaard-Hansen (forthcoming). Quality Issues in Cross-Disciplinary Research: Towards a Two-Pronged Approach to Evaluation. Social Epistemology 23 (2):165-176.
Sevasti-Melissa Nolas (2006). Learning as Support for Organizational Innovation: Possibilities and Limitations. World Futures 62 (3):240 – 260.
Andreas Pickel (2001). Between Social Science and Social Technology: Toward a Philosophical Foundation for Post-Communist Transformation Studies. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (4):459-487.
Jens Aagaard-Hansen (2007). The Challenges of Cross-Disciplinary Research. Social Epistemology 21 (4):425 – 438.
Patrick Carmichael (2011). Tribes, Territories and Threshold Concepts: Educational Materialisms at Work in Higher Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (s1):31-42.
Jaime Nubiola (2005). The Classification of the Sciences and Cross-Disciplinarity. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (2):271-282.
Tracy Bealer (2011). “The Innsmouth Look”. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 6 (14):44-50.
Kate Rousmaniere, Kari Dehli & Ning De Coninck-Smith (eds.) (1997). Discipline, Moral Regulation, and Schooling: A Social History. Garland Pub..
Tammy Lynn Castelein (2011). On Foucault's Last Philosophical Testament. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 7 (16):69-70.
Toby Seddon (2013). Regulating Health: Transcending Disciplinary Boundaries. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 21 (1):43-53.
David A. Washburn (1997). The MacKay-Skinner Debate: A Case for “Nothing Buttery”. Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):473 – 479.
Dolan Cummings (ed.) (2006). Debating Humanism. Imprint Academic.
Sanjeev Uprety (2005). Philosophical Ideas and Implications of Non-Western Studies. Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 1 (2):8-9.
Vassiliki Betty Smocovitis (1994). Contextualizing Science: From Science Studies to Cultural Studies. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:402 - 412.
Added to index2012-09-13
Total downloads4 ( #188,769 of 722,704 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,704 )
How can I increase my downloads?