David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (1):144-165 (2000)
This paper is concerned with changing social representations of the ``wild,'' in particular wild animals. We argue that within a contemporary Western context the old agricultural perception of wild animals as adversarial and as a threat to domestication, is being replaced by an essentially urban fascination with certain emblematic wild animals, who are seen to embody symbols of naturalness and freedom. On closer examination that carefully mediatized ``naturalness'' may be but another form of domestication. After an historical overview of the human-animal, domestic-wild construction, an anthropological approach is used to interpret the social representation of wild animals held by different social actors – farmers, hunters, and tourists – within the context of an inhabited National Park, that of the Cévennes in south east France. Within the Park, the domestic and the wild, along with agriculture, hunting, conservation, re-introduced wild animals, and tourists co-habit. It is argued that changes in the representation of ``wildness'' may well be an important indicator ofchanges in the social representation of nature.
|Keywords||Wild domestic animal conservation farming hunting tourism France|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Roger J. H. King (2003). The Place of Domesticated Spaces in Environmental Ethics. Social Philosophy Today 19:41-53.
Jac A. A. Swart (2004). The Wild Animal as a Research Animal. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):181-197.
Irene Klaver, Jozef Keulartz & Henk van den Belt (2002). Born to Be Wild. Environmental Ethics 24 (1):3-21.
Robert W. Loftin (1985). The Medical Treatment of Wild Animals. Environmental Ethics 7 (3):231-239.
Jac Swart & Jozef Keulartz (2011). Wild Animals in Our Backyard. A Contextual Approach to the Intrinsic Value of Animals. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):185-200.
Joel Marks (2010). Live Free or Die. [REVIEW] Animal Law 17 (1):243-250.
Stephen R. L. Clark (1979). The Rights of Wild Things. Inquiry 22 (1-4):171 – 188.
H. Verhoog (1992). The Concept of Intrinsic Value and Transgenic Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 5 (2):147-160.
Henk van den Belt (2002). Born to Be Wild. Environmental Ethics 24 (1):3-21.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #173,235 of 1,696,615 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #95,357 of 1,696,615 )
How can I increase my downloads?