David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):89 - 96 (1987)
The attitudes of 164 United States and 151 South African managers towards corporate social responsibility were assessed. The United States managers held significantly more favourable attitudes towards corporate social responsibility. In addition, they agreed with more pro-responsibility arguments, whereas the South African managers agreed with more anti-responsibility arguments. The United States managers felt that their society expected more corporate involvement in social responsibility activities than the South African managers felt was expected from their society. The results are explained in terms of the susceptibility of social responsibility attitudes to cultural norms and values — which reflect the different nature of the two societies.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Duygu Turker (2009). Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility: A Scale Development Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 85 (4):411 - 427.
John Tsalikis & David J. Fritzsche (1989). Business ethics: A literature review with a focus on marketing ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (9):695 - 743.
Liangrong Zu & Lina Song (2009). Determinants of Managerial Values on Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From China. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (1):105 - 117.
Mee-Kau Nyaw & Ignace Ng (1994). A Comparative Analysis of Ethical Beliefs: A Four Country Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (7):543 - 555.
Natalia Yakovleva & Diego Vazquez-Brust (2012). Stakeholder Perspectives on CSR of Mining MNCs in Argentina. Journal of Business Ethics 106 (2):191-211.
Similar books and articles
Ali M. Quazi & Dennis O'Brien (2000). An Empirical Test of a Cross-National Model of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):33 - 51.
Johanna Kujala (2010). Corporate Responsibility Perceptions in Change: Finnish Managers' Views on Stakeholder Issues From 1994 to 2004. Business Ethics 19 (1):14-34.
Max Baker & John Roberts (2011). All in the Mind? Ethical Identity and the Allure of Corporate Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 101 (S1):5-15.
Moses L. Pava & Joshua Krausz (1997). Criteria for Evaluating the Legitimacy of Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 16 (3):337-347.
Eun-Kyoung Han, Dong-Han Lee & Hyoungkoo Khang (2008). Influential Factors of the Social Responsibility of Newspaper Corporations in South Korea. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):667 - 680.
Dove Izraeli (1988). Ethical Beliefs and Behavior Among Managers: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (4):263 - 271.
Sean Valentine & Gary Fleischman (2008). Professional Ethical Standards, Corporate Social Responsibility, and the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 82 (3):657 - 666.
Joseph Heath & Wayne Norman (2004). Stakeholder Theory, Corporate Governance and Public Management: What Can the History of State-Run Enterprises Teach Us in the Post-Enron Era? Journal of Business Ethics 53 (3):247-265.
Nabil A. Ibrahim, Donald P. Howard & John P. Angelidis (2008). The Relationship Between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are There Differences Between Business Managers and Students? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):165 - 174.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #135,238 of 1,725,840 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #134,308 of 1,725,840 )
How can I increase my downloads?