Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):94-120 (2004)
|Abstract||: Bernard Rollin argues that it is permissible to change an animal's telos through genetic engineering, if it doesn't harm the animal's welfare. Recent attempts to undermine his argument rely either on the claim that diminishing certain capacities always harms an animal's welfare or on the claim that it always violates an animal's integrity. I argue that these fail. However, respect for animal dignity provides a defeasible reason not to engineer an animal in a way that inhibits the development of those functions that a member of its species can normally perform, even if the modification would improve the animal's welfare|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Dita Wickins-Dražilová (2006). Zoo Animal Welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (1).
Georges Chapouthier & Jean-Claude Nouët (eds.) (1998). The Universal Declaration of Animal Rights: Comments and Intentions. Ligue Française des Droits De L'Animal.
David Fraser (2008). Understanding Animal Welfare: The Science in its Cultural Context. Wiley-Blackwell.
Kirsten Schmidt (2011). Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):153-171.
C. R. W. Spedding (2000). Animal Welfare. Earthscan Publications.
Rob De Vries (2006). Genetic Engineering and the Integrity of Animals. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5).
David J. Mellor (2009). The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sara Elizabeth Gavrell Ortiz (2004). Beyond Welfare: Animal Integrity, Animal Dignity, and Genetic Engineering. Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):94-120.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #58,767 of 549,127 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,390 of 549,127 )
How can I increase my downloads?