David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (1):143-150 (2008)
This paper discusses the historiography of the ‘two cultures’ controversy. C. P. Snow’s lament about the ‘two cultures’, literary and scientific, has inspired a wide range of comment—much of which begins by citing Snow and his thesis, before going on to discuss very different things. This paper focuses upon one strand of this commentary, the historical analysis of the controversy itself. A ‘historical’ analysis is defined here as one that resists the impulse to enter the argument on behalf of Snow or Leavis, to conceive of their argument in the terms that Snow defined, or to invoke their argument as a precursor to some contemporary issue. Instead, a historical interpretation registers distance between that day and this, takes the controversy itself as its object of study, and explores the tensions and associations that came to be packed into those now familiar terms. As the fiftieth anniversary of Snow’s Rede Lecture nears, this approach—rather than the repetition of clichés about the bridging of cultures—offers both analytical perspective on the controversy and interpretive possibilities for its examination.Keywords: Two cultures; Literature; Cultural politics; C. P. Snow; F. R. Leavis; 1960s
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David Edgerton (2005). CP Snow as Anti-Historian of British Science: Revisiting the Technocractic Moment, 1959-1964. History of Science 43 (2):187-208.
Anna-K. Mayer (2005). Reluctant Technocrats: Science Promotion in the Neglect-of-Science Debate of 1916-1918. History of Science 43 (2):139-159.
Guy Ortolano (2005). FR Leavis, Science, and the Abiding Crisis of Modern Civilization. History of Science 43 (2):161-185.
Theodore M. Porter (2005). Introduction: Historicizing the Two Cultures. History of Science 43 (2):109-114.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1991). Der Zusammenhang Von Wissenschaftsphilosophie, Wissenschaftsgeschichte Und Wissenschaftssoziologie in der Theorie Thomas Kuhns. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 22 (1):43-59.
Claire Norton (ed.) (2007). Nationalism, Historiography, and the (Re)Construction of the Past. New Academia Pub..
I. C. Jarvie (1984). Anthropology as Science and the Anthropology of Science and of Anthropology or Understanding and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Part II. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:745 - 763.
Renan Springer de Freitas (2002). What Happened to the Historiography of Science? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (1):92-106.
Theodore Schatzki (2006). On Studying the Past Scientifically. Inquiry 49 (4):380 – 399.
Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, Achim Mittag & Jörn Rüsen (eds.) (2005). Historical Truth, Historical Criticism, and Ideology: Chinese Historiography and Historical Culture From a New Comparative Perspective. Brill.
Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1992). The Interrelations Between the Philosophy, History and Sociology of Science in Thomas Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Development. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (4):487-501.
Jonathan Locke Hart (2006). Interpreting Cultures: Literature, Religion, and Human Sciences. Palgrave Macmillan.
Martin E. Marty (2010). Building Cultures of Trust. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #302,338 of 1,692,891 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?