David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 37 (01):24- (1987)
It is no longer generally believed that Empedocles was the divided character portrayed by nineteenth-century scholars, a man whose scientific and religious views were incompatible but untouched by each other. Yet it is still widely held that, however unitary his thought, nevertheless he still wrote more than one poem, and that his poems can be clearly divided between those which do, and those which do not, concern ‘religious matters’.1 Once this assumption can be shown to be shaky or actually false, the grounds for dividing the quotations of Empedocles into two poems by subject matter disappear; and without that division our interpretation of Empedocles stands in need of radical revision. This paper startswith the modest task of showing that Empedocles may have written only one philosophical poem and not two, and goes on to suggest some of the ways in which we have to rethink the whole story if he did. If all our material belongs to one poem we are bound to link the cycle of the daimones with that of the elements, and this has far-reaching consequences for our interpretation.
|Keywords||Empedocles Two poems One poem|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Catherine Osborne (1987). Rethinking Early Greek Philosophy: Hippolytus of Rome and the Presocratics. Cornell University Press.
M. R. Wright (1981). Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. Yale University Press.
O. D. (1978). Empedocles with a Prefatory Essay 'Empedocles and T. S. Eliot' by Marshall Mcluhan. Review of Metaphysics 31 (3):488-489.
Rachana Kamtekar (2009). Knowing by Likeness in Empedocles. Phronesis 54 (3):215-238.
G. B. Kerferd (1971). Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle D. O'Brien: Empedocles' Cosmic Cycle. A Reconstruction From the Fragments and Secondary Sources. Pp. X+459. Cambridge: University Press, 1969. Cloth, £5·00. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (02):176-178.
Friedrich Solmsen (1975). Eternal and Temporary Beings in Empedocles' Physical Poem. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57 (2):123-145.
David Farrell Krell (2007). “A Double Tale I Shall Tell . . . ”: Empedocles and Hölderlin on Tragic Nature and Tragic Purification. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):287-304.
Gordon Campbell (2004). Empedocles. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Empedocles (1975). The Proem of Empedocles' Peri Physios: Towards a New Edition of All the Fragments: Thirty-One Fragments. B. R. Grüner.
Jonathan Barnes (1982). Empedocles M. R. Wright: Empedocles: The Extant Fragments. Edited with an Introduction, Commentary and Concordance. Pp. Vii + 364. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1981. £28. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 32 (02):191-196.
Marwan Rashed (2011). La zoogonie de la Haine selon Empedocle: retour sur lensemble d du papyrus dAkhmim. Phronesis 56 (1):33-57.
James Eric Butler (2005). Effluvia. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (2):215-231.
David Farrell Krell (2007). “A Double Tale I Shall Tell . . . ”. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (2):287-304.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads13 ( #334,660 of 1,941,049 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #334,047 of 1,941,049 )
How can I increase my downloads?