A note on formal learning theory

&
Cognition 11 (1):77-88 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1016/0010-0277(82)90005-1

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Editors' Introduction: Why Formal Learning Theory Matters for Cognitive Science.Sean Fulop & Nick Chater - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):3-12.
Formal Learning Theory and the Philosophy of Science.Kevin T. Kelly - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:413 - 423.
Formal learning theory.Oliver Schulte - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Testability and Ockham’s Razor: How Formal and Statistical Learning Theory Converge in the New Riddle of Induction. [REVIEW]Daniel Steel - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (5):471 - 489.
Learning theory and the philosophy of science.Kevin T. Kelly, Oliver Schulte & Cory Juhl - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (2):245-267.
Agency and Interaction What We Are and What We Do in Formal Epistemology.Jeffrey Helzner & Vincent Hendricks - 2010 - Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 27 (2).
Learning to Become Youth. An Action Theory Approach.Sven Mørch - 2006 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 8 (1):3-18.
Mind changes and testability: How formal and statistical learning theory converge in the new Riddle of induction.Daniel Steel - manuscript
No Answer to Hume.Colin Howson - 2011 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):279 - 284.
Logically reliable inductive inference.Oliver Schulte - 2007 - In Friend Michele, Goethe Norma B. & Harizanov Valentina (eds.), Induction, algorithmic learning theory, and philosophy. Springer. pp. 157-178.
The new enlightenment hypothesis: All learners are rational.Rita Nolan - 2009 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):219-220.
An analysis of a learning paradigm.Daniel Osherson, M. Stob & S. Weinstein - 1986 - In William Demopoulos (ed.), Language Learning and Concept Acquisition. Ablex. pp. 103.
What If the Principle of Induction Is Normative? Formal Learning Theory and Hume’s Problem.Daniel Steel & S. Kedzie Hall - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):171-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
85 (#191,493)

6 months
31 (#99,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Prototype theory and compositionality.H. Kamp & B. Partee - 1995 - Cognition 57 (2):129-191.
On the notion of concept I.Michael Freund - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence 172 (4-5):570-590.
On extensional learnability.Kenneth Wexler - 1982 - Cognition 11 (1):89-95.
Learning correction grammars.Lorenzo Carlucci, John Case & Sanjay Jain - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (2):489-516.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Formal models of language learning.Steven Pinker - 1979 - Cognition 7 (3):217-283.
Mother, Id rather do it myself: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style.E. Newport, Henry Gleitman & L. Gleitman - 1977 - In Catherine E. Snow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds.), Talking to Children. Cambridge University Press. pp. 109--149.

Add more references