Paradigms of truth detection

Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (1):1 - 42 (1989)
Alternative models of idealized scientific inquiry are investigated and compared. Particular attention is devoted to paradigms in which a scientist is required to determine the truth of a given sentence in the structure giving rise to his data
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00296173
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,879
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Charles X. Ling (1995). Introducing New Predicates to Model Scientific Revolution. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):19 – 36.
Daniel Osherson & Scott Weinstein (1995). On the Danger of Half-Truths. Journal of Philosophical Logic 24 (1):85 - 115.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

20 ( #139,590 of 1,725,162 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #81,204 of 1,725,162 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.