The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment

Journal of the History of Philosophy 34 (4):616-618 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1353/hph.1996.0078

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Review of Michael Hunter, The Boyle Papers: Understanding the Manuscripts of Robert Boyle (Ashgate, 2007). [REVIEW]Simon B. Duffy - 2008 - Reviews in the Enlightenment 1.
Robert Boyle and the heuristic value of mechanism.R. P. - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (1):157-170.
Boyle, classification and the workmanship of the understanding thesis.Jan-Erik Jones - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (2):171-183.
Robert Boyle on things above reason.Thomas Holden - 2007 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):283 – 312.
Robert Boyle's epistemology: The interaction between scientific and religious knowledge.J. J. MacIntosh - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (2):91 – 121.
Kant on Experiment.Alberto Vanzo - 2012 - In James Maclaurin (ed.), Rationis Defensor. Springer. pp. 75-96.
Boyle and Locke on Observation, Testimony, Demonstration and Experience.J. J. MacIntosh - 2005 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (2):275-288.
Robert Boyle and the limits of reason.Jan W. Wojcik - 1997 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-28

Downloads
24 (#603,118)

6 months
7 (#285,926)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references